Search Results
Assignment… as in say, a deed
My friend David Gammon and I were ruminating about some property that a person had acquired and we could not find a source for where he had gotten it… David speculated he may have inherited it via primogeniture and there simply was no record. Then we further speculated he may have been assigned the property… all of which got me curious about the machinations of “assignment”. I looked around a bit but was disappointed… way too much legalese presented itself, much like an irksome rash. I thought of consulting my trusty sidekick Jennifer from California but rethought that because well…her mind has been “washed” by her having attended law school. Yes indeed, I figured, better not open that Pandora’d Box unless I have to.
So I consulted the calm and studied Traci the Librarian… she promptly responded with this:
“ASSIGNMENT – A transfer in writing of all or any part of an interest in property.”
Helen F.M. Leary, editor, North Carolina Research: Genealogy and Local History, 2nd edition (Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Genealogical Society, 1996), Appendix A, “Selected Terms and Abbreviations,”, p. 571.
Traci is a Certified Genealogist…therefore she slings footnotes around as if they were confetti at a parade… can’t help herself. But then, in her thoroughness, she just has to go that extra mile…
“ASSIGNMENT – A transfer or making over to another of the whole of any property, real or personal, in possession or in action, or of any estate or right therein…The transfer of the interest one has in lands and tenements…It includes transfers of all kinds of property, but is ordinarily limited to transfers of choses in action and to rights in or connected with property, as distinguished from the particular item of property…The transfer of interest one has in lands and tenements, more particularly applied to the unexpired residue of a term or estate for life or years…The distinction between an ‘assignment’ and a ‘sublease’ is that an assignment transfers the entire unexpired term…The deed by which the transfer is made.” (Under this are many subtopics for more specific situation, such as “assignment for the benefit of creditors,” etc.)
Henry Campbell Black, Black’s Law Dictionary, rev. 4th Ed. (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1968), p. 153.
My understanding is that the 4th edition was the last one that included historic terms – “Editions of Black’s Law Dictionary more recent than the Fourth are much less useful to genealogists than earlier ones. To make room for new material, more modern editions have dropped the very words the genealogist may need to interpret old documents–the archaic and obsolete terms that haven’t been used for a century or more.” Donn Devine, CG, CGI” https://www.familyrootspublishing.com/store/product_view.php?id=1743
_____________________________________________
But as is my want, I simply could not resist running this by Jennifer from California… she replied surprisingly in agreement with Traci’s first inclination:
From a historical view, in the most simple explanation of use;
A transfer in writing of all or any part of an interest in property. Aha! I thought, there can be a simple answer!
But then and there she lost control and just HAD to opine …
Assignment
The first thing that came to mind (modernly) was in the context of Secured Transactions.
There are scholarly papers that address Secured Transactions in Colonial times (i.e. Harvard Law Review).
Interpreting the use of a word (Assignment) takes into consideration the time and place (jurisdiction) it was written and the context in which it was used.
Example; 1647, Upon her husband’s death, her estate was to be assigned to her by her husband’s heir or other person interested [records of Mass. 169-170 (1854).
Or, in the context of a Secured Transaction (Colonial)
A suit of debt may have been brought for the sole purpose of publishing a transaction or memorializing a transactional event. Property of 100 ac is sold by Marc to David. David promises to make a payment or payments on said property to Marc. Marc files suit against David stating David must pay him $100 on a certain future date (condition of the obligation) and when payment is made (or a final payment made) the said property will be deeded to David (David is likely living on said property during this time). Now Marc, who is in need of money to buy beaver skins from Traci, assigns to Traci the right to receive said future payment/payments.
This transaction is secured because Marc gave notice in a court of law of the debt.
The transfer of the interest
What is the interest being transferred? It may be the transfer of ownership to a particular property. Personal or Real. (PP personal property, RP real property). It may be the transfer of a debt.
Modernly
An obligation is a legal transaction in which parties bind themselves to either act or refrain from acting. An obligation is a legal relationship between two or more persons. An obligation exists when: (1) an obligor (debtor) owes a performance in favor of an obligee (creditor); and (2) the performance or duty is legally enforceable.
The obligee is entitled to judicial enforcement of the obligor’s duty to perform, and to recover damages if the obligor fails to perform
“ASSIGNMENT – A transfer in writing of all or any part of an interest in property.”
Note: this is where the law school comes out… old coots like me know weasel words when we hear them… no offense… again, she just kaint help herself…
Stated broadly, yes. But in the world of Contracts, the word “Legal” interest might be inserted.
I cannot legally assign my interest to Marc if I owe David money on the purchase of said property. I would need to secure the written permission from David.
‘Course if I run in to a problem with David… who do you think I’m gonna call?
_______________________________________
Shame on law schools! and damn them to hell! A perfectly good mind twisted and turned beyond all reasonableness. This is her Cliff Notes version… can you imagine if I cut her loose…
I’m kidding of course… this just goes to show the complexities that are involved. But in the sense that I was looking for, I think that an “assignment” in colonial times (which was very much English Common Law) can be viewed by way of an analogy to the title of a car. You sell Joe your car and sign over the title…he goes on a drunken binge, gets waylayed and thrown into jail for two years… he emerges from jail and needs a car… but! he must jump thru hoops and get the damn car “registered” by the state.
Similarly an assignment of property had to be recognized by a court to be further dealt with… my point being this can explain the delays seen in some property transactions. Joe may have been living on his property and all of a sudden (twenty years later, he runs in to court and registers the property).
I think this also explains the occasional “and written on the back of the deed” was shazam! an assignment.
It all depends on what the meaning of IS is…
Good Lord… I do go on incessantly… here is a recent example of what I am talking about with “assignments”… this patent was assigned “on the back of the patent” in 1695 (but it did not really “ripen” until 1735)… 40 years…
Now I am trying to figure out where the other half of the Scott patent went… I think it was perhaps assigned to Richard Barefield… now to prove it.
Benjamin Hill…. merchant
I figure I might try to redeem myself after my previous scathing Post concerning William Litlle. I think I have captured the gist of where Benjamin Hill lived west of the Chowan River…
This guy got rich and successful the old fashioned way… he earned it …(as the old TV commercial went). That is to say that one did not have to cheat widows, orphans, cripples and Indians out of their land. (Sorry, I could not pass up the dig).
Hill is in the center of the map… note the location on his property of “Hill’s Ferry”. According to Sally, that ferry was in continuous operation until 1940 when it finally washed away and was not rebuilt. (evidently there is a bridge there now…who’dathunkit). Just Google “Sally’s Family Place” for her interesting research on Hill (her clues helped with my map.)
____________________________________________________
This guy married a daughter of Hill… I will try to map him later…
Evidently a Progressive Democrat absconded with his wife and pissed off Mr. Hill…he sued the snake in the grass… this could be interesting to follow up…I know how some of you people are.
John Campbell
In 1743 John Campbell, a Captain in the British navy purchased 800 acres of land on the west side of the Chowan River near Webbs Ferry. This ferry operated across Chowan River to Bandon in Chowan County. The settlement grew and Campbell named it Colerain after his hometown in Ireland. Campbell brought seine fishing to America. His beautiful estate he named Lazy Hill.He became known as the “Merchant Prince of Lazy Hill.” Involved in fishing, farming, and shipping, he was responsible for shipment of Bertie County Clay to the factory at Bow in England for manufacture of pottery for export back to America. His brother there was a stockholder in that manufacturing. In 1740 he married Mary Hill, daughter of Benjamin Hill (one of the Northern faction who opposed Gov. Gabriel Johnston’s representation proposal). They had two sons, James and John; a daughter, Sarah, who married 1)Richard Brownrigg of Chowan 2)Capt. David Merideth.An epidemic of fever broke out all along the river settlements. Many of the people died, others discouraged, moved away or farther inland. John Campbell moved to Halifax County near Weldon.When his estate was sold it was listed as follows: “One tract of land known as “Lazy Hill” lying in Bertie County on the west side of Chowan River, containing 800 acres. It is a beautiful situation well watered, on its premises are a good dwelling house, kitchen store, warehouse, workhouse, barns milk and meat house, stables. Together with a good shad and herry fishery, a good apple and peach orchard and two vegetable gardens.”Campbell worshiped at St. Paul’s Church in Edenton. It is said he was a loyal patriot, devoted heart and soul to the American cause. Sanders rates him in ability to Joseph Hewes. He was known as the leading merchant of the province. He served and represented Bertie County in the General Assembly in 1744, 1745, also 1754- 1760; again 1769-1775. He served in four provincial Congresses at New Bern in 1744- 45; Hillsborough in 1775 and Halifax in 1776.Campbell was made famous (or infamous) for the sordid affair termed “The Bear and the Evil Genius,” published by Dr. Thomas Parramore, now professor Emeritus of Meridith College in Raleigh NC. It involved that era’s most widely publicized court case between John Campbell and a Dr. Lennox from Windsor, Bertie County who attempted to flee the country with John’s wife. The lawsuit was for Alienation of Affections (in the early 1700’s.) Dr. Lennox cross sued for Defamation of Character!John Campbell’s will (Will Bk C page 4) was written Apr 19, 1777 and probated in Bertie County, Feb Court 1781. This will mentions his wife, Mary; Grandsons, John Campbell, Thomas, John, Jane and Sarah Brownrigg (children of daughter Sarah); daughter Sarah [Brownrigg] Merideth ; also his brother, James, and sisters, Mary and Elizabeth. He gave Lazy Hill to his grandson, John Campbell (“son of my son James”)
Resource: Harry Thompson, HistorianJohn Johnston John Johnston was a member of the Colonial Assembly 1773, 1773-1774, 1775. He represented Bertie County in the 2nd Provincial Convention – New Bern, Apri 1775. He was also a member of the Provinical Congress 1775, April-May 1776, and Nov-Dec 1776. In 1788, 1789 represented Bertie Co in the Senate – voting for ratification. He was the brother of Samuel Johnston of Perquimans, who was the President of both Conventions. He became a citizen of Hertford Co. He died too young (1791) to attain the traditional prominence. He was of the same name as the nephew of Gov Johnston of Chowan and is often confused.His son, John Scrymoure Johnston, married Betsy Cotten, daughter of Godwin Cotton of Mulberry Grove (Hertford County) and resided near there. They had two children: Rev, Sam J. Johnston, DD for years rector of St. Pauls’ Edenton and Sallie Anne, who married James D. Wynns.
source:
Back Swamp study (colonial Nansemond County VA, Somerton Creek area)
The Boyt (numerous spellings) Boyett folks have asked me to look into their folks from Nansemond County. Folks somewhat familiar with my methodology realize that I come and go not dissimilar to a mental patient. Comments have distinct motivational jolts to my fragile neurons. What tantalizing tidbits are you folks interested in?
Use your Command key and +or- to enlarge or reduce the size after clicking. Control key for you Windows losers.(smiling)
Commenter David Boyett sent me a handy dandy link from the Library of Virginia featuring 18 instances of the mention of “Back Swamp” which I have dutifully consulted…
Keen observers of my rants might realize that I have somewhat covered this area… but my methods have improved a bit with time. Perhaps I am a bit more “accurate” now. Wishful thinking on my part… as always this is generally guesswork on my part and I always stand ready to be corrected with a rational alternative… facts are nice.
An accurate map of North and South Carolina, with their Indian frontier, shewing in a distinct manner all the mounta]ins, rivers, swamps, marshes, bays, creeks, harbours, sandbanks and soundings on the coasts; with the roads and Indian paths; as well as the boundary or provincial lines, the several townships, and other divisions of the land in both the provinces;
https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3900.ar139404/?r=0.133,-0.318,0.947,0.721,0
Quit Rents 1704 Nansemond
A Compleat List of the Rent Roll of the Land in Nansemond County In Anno 1704 source: The Planters of Colonial Virginia, by Thomas J. Wertenbaker John Murdaugh 300 Jno Duke 113 Thomas Duke Jun 930 Edward Roberts 250 Paul Pender 240 Thomas Duke 400 James Fowler 440 Robert Baker 50 Isaac Sketto 100 Edward Sketto 200 Antho Gumms 50 Francis Sketto. 100 Wm Parker 100 Francis Parker 170 Thomas Parker 300 Jno Small 100 Moses Hall 95 Edward Beamond 550 Richard Parker 514 Capt James Jessey 550 Wm Sanders 200 Jno Sanders 165 Thomas Mansfield 60 Wm Woodley 350 Andrew Bourne 200 Gilbert Owen 120 Wm Sanders Jun 165 Capt John Speir 500 Capt James Reddick 943 James Griffin 500 Nicholas Stallings 965 John Stallings 250 Richard Stallings 165 Elias Stallings Jun 250 Joseph Baker 740 Wm Jones 500 Robert Roundtree 245 John Roundtree 475 George Spivey 200 James Spivey 600 James Knight 300 Jno Gorden 330 Edward Arnold 80 James Mulleny 500 Thomas Docton 200 Wm Britt 400 Nath Newby 850 Elias Stalling 470 Robert Lassiter 850 Patrick Wood 200 Wm Thompson 133 Jonathan Kitterell 300 Adam Rabey 586 Jno Powell 758 John Reddick 300 Henry Copeland 150 Thomas Davis 250 Jno Smith 100 Thomas Harrald 652 Richard Baker 40 Samuell Smith 230 Wm Hood 200 Thomas Roundtree 350 Henry Hill 175 Jno Larkhum 500 Wm Vann 100 Joseph Cooper 267 John Harris 600 Francis Copeland 513 Elizabeth Price 150 Wm Hill 150 Thomas Spivey 200 Jno Campbell 400 Jno Morley 100 Jos Rogers 15 Jno Cole 814 Thomas Harrald 100 Christopher Gawin Jun 20 Daniell Horton 200 Wm Bruin 300 Peter Eason 400 Anne Pugh 2300 Benj Blanchard 130 Thomas Norfleet 500 John Odum 50 Thomas Gough 150 Hugh Gough 150 Epapap Boyne 100 Henry Baker 375 Christopher Gwin 1010 James Speirs 200 Epaphra Benton 250 Wm Eason 180 Andrew Brown 25 Wm Horne 100 Robert Reddick 200 Henry Hackley 210 Thomas Roberts 30 Abr Reddick 400 Jno Parker 240 Richard Barefield 900 John Benton 660 Jno Pipkin 100 Jos Brady 250 Christopher Dudley 200 Thomas Norris 100 Thomas Wiggins 100 Patrick Lawley 50 Robert Warren 100 Richard Odium 50 Thomas Davis 340 Thomas Barefield 100 John Eason 150 Jerimiah Arlin 250 Jno Perry 870 Jno Drury 87 Joseph Booth 987 Cresham Cofield 350 Richard Sumner 600 Edward Norfleet 200 Jno Norfleet 600 Edward Moore 250 Thomas Moore 200 James Lawry 40 James Daughtie 400 John Wallis 150 Richard Sanders Jun 100 Wm Byrd 300 James Howard 700 John Brinkley 430 Robert Horning 80 Wm Speirs 200 Sarah Exum 150 Jno Larrence 175 Nicholas Perry 200 Sampson Merridith 400 Coll Thomas Milner 1484 Joseph Merridith 250 Thomas Kinder 160 Henry King 300 Joseph Hine 150 Wm King 140 Julian King 700 Mich King 80 Capt Tho Godwin Jun 697 Henry Lawrence 200 Jno King 1000 Richard Hyne 200 Capt Francis Milner 479 Benj Nevill 475 Elizabeth Marler 80 Wm Keene 200 Jno Symmons 678 Hen: Johnson 150 Jno Darden 500 Wm Everett 150 Wm Pope 890 Joseph Worrell 270 Thomas Jemegan Jun 135 Richard Lawerence 200 Jonathan Robinson 400 Robert Yates 150 Thomas Odium 20 John Barefield 300 John Raules 600 Thomas Boyt 400 Thomas Vaughan 200 Jno Parker 300 Richard Green 200 Elizabeth Ballard 300 Samuell Watson 200 Francis Spight 400 Joseph Ballard 200 John Oxley 100 Benj Rogers 600 Robert Rogers 300 Henry Jerregan 200 Jno Hansell 500 Henry Jenkins 400 Capt William Hunter 800 Jno Moore 200 Richard Moore 250 Edward Homes 300 Fra Cambridge 100 Wm Ward 200 Jno Rice 140 Wm Battaile 800 Wm Spite 500 Abr Oadham 20 Jacob Oadam 20 Jno Lee 100 Wm Macklenny 200 Robert Coleman 1400 Jno Bryan 200 Wm Daughtree 100 Jno Copeland 600 Jno Butler 200 James Butler 75 Thomas Roads 75 Wm Collins 1220 Jno Hedgpath 700 Jno Holland 700 Robert Carr 200 Wm Waters 600 Robert Lawrence 400 Wm Bryon 350 Lewis Bryon 400 James Lawrence 100 Wm Gatlin 100 Joseph Gutchins 250 George Lawrence 400 Lewis Daughtree 100 Thomas Rogers 50 Jno Rogers 200 Henry Core 50 Edward Cobb 100 Richard Taylor 300 Robert Brewer 200 Wm Osburne 200 Thomas Biswell 400 Jno Gatlin 200 Richard Folk 100 Thomas Parker 100 Peter Parker 140 Wm Parker 140 Richard Hine Jun 200 Stephen Archer 200 Charles Roades 800 Henry Roades 100 James Collings 300 Henry Holland 400 Wm Kerle 325 Joseph Holland 100 Jno Thomas Jun 100 Jno Thomas 275 Thomas Mason 350 Edward Mason 150 Jno Sanders 150 Mich Brinkley 200 James Moore 400 Henry Blumpton 1500 Jno Symmons 100 Jeremiah Edmunds 70 John Gay 200 Philip Aylsberry 100 James Copeland 390 Jno Brothers 460 Richard Creech 200 Richard Bond 90 Thomas Handcock 30 James Knott 1050 Wm Edwards 150 Robert Elkes 175 Edward Price 140 Jane Belson 100 Wm Staples 210 Robert Mountgomery 150 John Moore 100 Capt Edmund Godwin 800 Thomas Wakefield 150 Godfrey Hunt 360 Henery Wilkinson 250 Nicholas Dixon 200 George Keeley 650 Richard Taylor 300 Anne Coefield 300 Joseph Hollyday 1000 Mr Jno Braisseur 400 Thomas Best 160 Alexander Campbell 500 Capt Charles Drury 570 Thomas Drury 75 Luke Shea 650 John Babb 500 Abraham Edwards 400 Richard Sanders 500 Antho Wallis 80 Daniell Sullivan 100 Joseph Ellis 290 Nicholas Hunter 190 Richard Webb 200 John Hare 190 Christopher Norfleet 400 Jno Heslop 148 Francis Benton 200 Capt Wm Sumner 275 Elizabeth Syrte 100 Anne Hare 600 Jno Porter 450 Edward Welsh 100 Jno Winbourne 400 Paul Pender 200 Mich Cowling 100 John Cowling 100 Rowland Gwyn 75 Andrew Ross 150 Jno Ballard 400 Benjamin Montgomery 910 Thomas Corbell 200 Jno Yates 400 Jno White 150 George White 50 Jno Bond 150 Wm Hay 100 Henry Bowes 600 Wm Sevill 85 Jno Hambleton 200 Robert Jordan 850 James Howard 25 Ruth Coefield 110 Jno Chilcott 100 Jno Rutter 80 Thomas Rutter 75 Wm Rutter 75 Capt Barnaby Kerney 460 Thomas Cutchins 150 Robert Lawrence 130 Samuell Cahoone 240 Jno Iles 220 Thomas Sawyer 180 Wm Outland 400 Coll George Northworthy 650 Coll Thomas Godwin 810 Caleb Taylor 200 Thomas Carnell 320 Richard Bradley 250 Jno Corbin 300 Wm Sykes 150 Major Thomas Jorden 700 Richard Lovegrove 150 Thomas Davis 144 Samuell Farmer 160 Henry Bradley 500 Jno Clarke 25 Margarett Jorden 200 Wm Elkes 100 Humphrey Mires 150 James Ward 100 Widdow Hudnell 45 Wm Grandberry 300 Israell Shepherd 200 Benj. Small 100 Anne Crandberry 75 Charles Roberts 50 Richard Sclator 300 Robert Murrow 320 Elizabeth Peters 334 Thomas Jones 200 Elizabeth Butler 200 Coll Samuell Bridger 500 Jno Lawrence 100 Thomas Jarregan 165 Thomas Jarregan Jun 600 Wm Drury 80 Wm Butler 120 Henry Jenkins 860 Edward Bathurst 250 Thomas Houffler 200 Edward Streater 200 Wm Duffield 50 Charles Thomas Jun 50 Jno Blessington 150 Ursula Goodwin 100 Thomas Acwell 440 Wm Peale 180 John Lambkin 50 James Murphice 160 Robert Peale 275 John Peters 368 James Peters 340 John Wakefield 50 Richard Wynn 890 James Lockhart 800 John Keeton 2000 ------ 117024 Jno Murrow 200 ------ 117224 Added to make up equll 13850 the last year list ------ which may be supposed 131074 to be held by persons that have not made both Persons living out of the County and other that will not pay or give account. Viz: Capt Thomas Lovett Capt Jno Wright Fra Parker Jun Tho Martin Jno Wright Wm Lapiter Jno Lapiter Capt Luke Haffield Mrs Elizabeth Swann Errors excepted per me Henry Jenkins
a Pond in Isle of Wight…
No, seriously, a damn pond has me all in a mental turmoil… the question with myself is could a “particular” pond be 400 years old? Bear with me – I’ll get to it.
Hugh Campbell… who the hell was this guy? He shows up around 1685 or so? and starts buying up more damn property than Rush Limbaugh has sponsors on his radio show.
A nice guy… he gives away land in 3 counties for “schools”. The counties were IOW, Nansemond and maybe “Norfolk” wherever that was “officially”? Say around 1700.
But back to the damn pond… later.
Several years ago I “mapped” Robert Pitts patent… and dutifully wrote all my words of wisdom about his doings and the aftermath of all his doings and his descendants. Little did I realize that I was talking out of my ass. (for lack of a better terminology… I’m a ground to earth kind of guy).
This Hugh Campbell guy swoops in and buys ALL the land of Robert Pitt. Coll Pitt was a hotshot from England with entangling alliances which leave his descendants all aquiver with “stuff” which is just plain fun genealogically.
But I draw maps. I get distraught and upset when some interloper comes in and messes up my damn maps.
Here… just look at the proof…
See that 1200 acres that the good Coll Pitt acquired? I worked my ass off to figure out where that nifty little curved arrow DEFINED where this land actually was. This patent, in my opinion, can be considered a first proof. Go ahead… bring up an expert to refute me. I dare you.
And now I confront this… Mr Campbell buys the said property. What 1699? 98?… I don’t give a damn… he bought the whole damn property! (45 YEARS later)
Look at it!
So every thing that you and I thought about this particular patent (‘land’ in common terms) is brought into QUESTION. What we thought we know ain’t necessarily so. (Considering his descendants.)
The damn POND will be the proof of where Giles Driver and Ambrose Bennet had their land.
Like I stated…I’m a mapper… south of here is a pond I think is 400 years old which will tell the tale…
If I can do it… I will map Ambrose Bennett, Giles Driver and Robert Bracewell… it all depends on the “pond”. If my hunch is correct.
Oh… here is the pond… use Google maps to find it…
My simple reason for thinking it may be 400+ years old is the feeder creek leading to it… from Cypress Creek
Oh… and no one to my knowledge has ever been able to do what I am attempting here,,, so I have that going for me…
My IOW map is “not ready for prime time” and I am still revising away. But I just got this comment and have a few things to say…
In my research of the Jolly family I found a land grant in Bertie Co., NC issued to Thomas Goodson 150 acres south of the Maherrin River Dec. 1, 1727. ………”Beginning at a pine Thomas Boons corner tree standing in the Wild Cat Swamp……..” Thomas Goodson married Elizabeth Jolly who was the daughter of James Jolly of Isle of Wight Co., my 6th great grandfather. When Thomas Goodson died in 1761 he and his family lived in Tarboro, NC. His will stated that he left half of his lot No. 57 in Tarboro to his daughter Winne and the other half to his wife Elizabeth.
William Jolly of IOW just happens to be on my radar, along with some other folks. And they are all centered around The Pond. The Pond is noted by the asterisk:
The base map is dated about 1920 or so… making those ponds at least 100 years old.
If I can “accurately place” Ambrose Bennet’s 1641 patent then all the other landowners will fall in place and I can merrily proceed with my mapping. My ranting about Robert Pitt’s 1654 patent is another milestone. Hugh Campbell purchased his land in 1698/9. So that is accurate… the metes and bounds of his freshly minted patent 45 years later is verbatim .
Robert Coleman purchased 300 acres of Ambrose Bennet’s land in 1667… and you can see it represented above. Coleman’s patent noted The Pond. Likewise with Hugh Campbell’s later purchase of the same land in 1699. Likewise William Jolly’s patent mentions it in 1704.
A major difference to Campbell’s later patent can be seen (I have both patents shown on the map above). And the difference is purchases which involved Giles Driver. Hugh Campbell also purchased part of Giles Driver’s land. Just as with a jig saw puzzle, I need to have those “anchor points” to connect the other pieces.
So these are the hoops I am jumping through to sort out the map. Good Grief. But a good thing about all these mysteries is the tantalizing revelations which are revealed… as to my commenter, just look at William Jolly and his neighbors after 1700. Note Mary Jolly (Corne Swamp) and the earlier John Jolly. Good clues…
Bond… John Bond… and Thomas Harris… and others in IOW
A little blip on my map… a slight reference that perhaps may juice up some research into some Isle of Wight folks. And like… Oh, I don’t know… stir up some comments.
The patent of the 2 sons of Thomas Harris above is “washed out” and cannot be read on the Library of Virginia website… bummer. The abstract was made by Nugent in 1938 or so and was readable obviously. My interest is in any metes and bounds that may have been noted, which leaves me in a lurch to plot the damn patent. In any event… I am pretty sure my map is “close”.
The John Bond reference is that his property adjoined Nicholas Cobb. And that area is interesting… and once more I defer to some research of Matt Harris:
http://files.usgwarchives.net/va/isleofwight/deeds/harris12.txt
ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY, VA - DEEDS - John BOND to Thomas HARRIS 13 Jan 1664 Deed of Bargain & Sale Thomas HARRIS & wife Alice to John BOND 20 Oct 1664 Assignment of Patents Thomas HARRIS & wife Alice to Giles DRYVER [DRIVER] 2 May-1 Nov 1667 Deeds of Lease & Release ----¤¤¤---- [p.] 38 [...] Know all men by these p'sents that I John BOND of the Isle of Wight County in Virginia hath bargained sould and delivered unto Thomas HARRIS of the afores'd County One Corne mill standing att the head of the Pagan Creek in the said County of the Isle of Wight as shee now goeth w.th all such Materialls or thereunto belongeth [altered from "belonging"] with free priviledge to take what Tymber the said HARRIS shall have Occasion to use for the necessary repair of the said Mill worke or Fludgates with free passage to & from the said Mill soe as not any damage or hindrance may happen thereby unto the said BOND his Heires Executo.rs or Assignes, which Mill I hence disclayme as wholly belonging to him the said HARRIS his Heires Executo.rs Adm.rs or Assignes for ever with warranty from any Claymes to be made there, unto the said Mill, by me my Heires or Executo.rs, as Witness my hand [altered from "hands"] this 13.th day of January 1663 [1663/4] and seal Witt's John BOND Henry KING Alce W PHILLIPS her m'ke Acknowledged and delivered by Majo.r John BOND unto Thomas HARRIS in Open Court this First day of May 1665 Test Jn.o JENNIGS Cler Cur Record.d First May 1665 [page end] [p.] 39 Know all men by these p'sents, That I Thomas HARRIS of the Isle of Wight County in Virginia Planter, and Alice my Wife doe for us o.r Heires Executo.rs & Administrato.rs make over bargaine, sell & alientate, unto Maj.r John BOND of the same County gen.t his Heires Executo.rs or Assignes, One hundred & Ninety Acres of Land Comprized in two severall Pattents scituated lyeing & being att y.e head of the Pagan Creek in the aforesaid County (vizt) one pattent being in y.e name of John VASSER Conteyning One hundred & Fifty Acres of Land & bearing date the Eighteenth day of November 1635 and in the Eleaventh year of the reigne of o.r Soveraigne Lord King Charles the first, [VASLER, PB1:310] and the other Pattent conteyning forty acres, of Land and taken in the name of the said Thomas HARRIS, bearing date y.e Fourteenth day of August 1652 [PB3:205; renewed 6 Jun 1664, PB5:273] the said hundred & Ninety Acres of Land, to have and to; ['hold' omitted] accordeing to y.e bounds expressed in each Pattent, with all the cleared grounds, houseings Fences & Orchards all Priveledges & Royaltyes whatsoever thereunto belongeth unto him the said John BOND his Heires Executo.rs or Assignes for ever, with Generall Warranty against the Claymes Tytles or Molestaçons of any P/son or Persons whatsoever, to any P/te or P/cell thereof; for all which Wee the aboves'd Thomas and Alce [sic] doe acknowledge o.r selves fully paid and sattisfied before the sealing & delivery hereof And for A full and absolute Confirmaçon To all and singular intents and purposes, doe Oblidge o.r selves to acknowledge this Our volluntary Act & Deed, att the next Court to hould in the Isle of Wight County, Witness our hands Seales, This Twentieth day of October 1664 ~ Signed Sealed & delivered Thomas HARRIS In the P'sence of Sigill Henry KING Alce + HARRIS Alce ~~ PHILLIPS Sigill her marke her marke [¼'d circle] This Conveyance is delivered and acknowledged Unto Maj.r John BOND in Open Co.rt by M.r Thomas HARRIS and Alce his Wife y.e 1.st day of May 1665 Teste Jn.o JENINGS Cler Cur Record primo die Maÿ 1665 [page end] [p] 116 Know all men by these p'sents that I John BOND of the Isle of Wight County in Virginia hath bargained sould & delivered unto Thomas HARRIS of the aforesaid County, One Cornemill standing att the head of the Pagan Creek in the same County of the Isle of Wight as shee now goeth with all such materialls as thereunto belongeth, with free priveledge to take what Timber the said HARRIS shall have occasion for to use for the necessary repair of the said Mill work or Floodgates with free passage to & from the said Mill soe as not any damage or hindreance may happen thereby unto ye said BOND his heires Ex.rs or Assignes which Mill I doe disclayme as wholly belonging to him the said HARRIS his Heires Ex.rs Adm.rs or Assignes for ever, with Warrantie from any Claymes to be made thereunto the said Mill by me my Heires or Ex.rs as witness my hand the 13th day of Jan.ry 1663 John BOND Sigill Wit Henry KING Alce PHILLIPS W her m'ke Acknowledged & delivered by Major John BOND unto Thomas HARRIS in Open Co.rt this first day of may 1665 And then Recorded Test Jn.o JENNIGS Cler Cur These p'sents witness that I Thomas HARRIS of ye Isle of Wight County for a valluable Consideraçon in hand rec'ed doe Assigne & make over unto M.r Giles DRYVER of the said County his Heires Ex.rs Adm.rs and Assignes all my Right Title Clayme & interest to the Bill of Sale within menc'oned for A Mill with all its priveledges and appert'ences, whatsoever therein expressed with Warranty against all Claymes whatsoever as alsoe ag.t any Clayme or P'tence of Clayme now or hereafter to be made by me ye sd Thomas HARRIS my Heires or Adm.rs or any Person or Persons whatsoever by us or any of Our precurem.ts In witness hereof I have hereunto sett my hand & seal this 2.d day of May in the year of Lord 1667 Tho: HARRIS Sigill Signed Sealed & d'd in ye P'sence of Nich HILL Josep RUDD J m'ke This Mill w.th in mençoned to be delivered w.th its appert'ences to M.r DRYVER or his Assignes ye 5.th day of 9.br [November] next & untill y.t tyme ye whole P'fitts to be ye use And behoofe of M.r Tho: HARRIS or Assignes In witness hereof I have hereunto sett my hand & seal this 2.d day of May in the year of Lord 1667 Tho HARRIS Sigill Witt Nich HILL Joseph RUDD J m'ke [page break] [p] 117 Know that I Thomas HARRIS and Alce my Wife doe by these P'sents Assigne make over possess and deliver unto M.r Giles DRYVER the Mill with all the appertences thereunto belonging to him his Heires Ex.rs Adm.rs and Assignes for ever, w.th warranty of the Just Sale thereof from us or either of us our heires Executo.rs Adm.rs or Assignes or any other Persons whatsoever in this Sale mençoned And doe oblidge o.r selves to Acknowledge this our Act in the Open Court of Isle of Wight County the 9.th day of this p'sent month Witness our hands the first day of November 1667 Tho: HARRIS Alce HARRIS + m'ke [¼'d circle] Signed & deliv'ed in p'sents of us John BOND John HARDY Acknowledged & Confirmed this Sale of the Mill by M.r Thomas HARRIS and Alce his Wife unto M.r Giles DRYVER in ye Open Co.rt held for the Isle of Wight County the 9.th day of December 1667 And then recorded Test Jn.o JENNINGS Cler.Cur [Thomas' wife Alice (his 2d) may have been a WEST; she 2m. John SOJOURNER. John BOND is thought to have 3m. Dorothy HARRIS BAKER, Thomas' sister and widow of John BAKER.] Isle of Wight Co., VA, Record of Wills, Deeds, Etc., Vol. 1 (1662-1715), pp. 38-39, 116-17 The Library of Virginia, Isle of Wight Co. Microfilm Reel 22 abstracted by Matt HARRIS [surname capitalization, line breaks & brackets mine] see also Virginia Land Office, Patent Book 1 (1623-1643), p. 310 The Library of Virginia, Virginia Land Office Patent and Grant Database, Image 001_0312.tif Virginia Land Office, Patent Book 3 (1652-1655), p. 205 Image 002_0634.tif Virginia Land Office, Patent Book 5 (1661-1666), p. 273 Image 005_0290.tif ___________________________________________________________________ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm This file was contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives by: Matthew W. Harris Zoobug64@aol.com ___________________________________________________________________ https://beta.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/crispincousins/conversations/messages/1325
ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY, VA - DEEDS - John HARRIS & Thomas HARRIS, bros. 26 Mar 1711 Deed of Covenant ----¤¤¤---- [p.] (181) [...Deed, Richard (RP) PUGH to John GILL, rec. 26 Mar 1711; wits: A.r SMITH, John HOLE, John (I) SURBY....] [margin note] HARRIS Deed to Each other This Indenture of Covenant made Concluded & agreed by & between Jn.o HARRIS of the Upper Parish of Isle of Wight County of the one part & Thomas HARRIS of the Said parish & County of the other part Witnesseth That for & in Consideraç'on y.e the afores.d Jn.o & Thomas at this time stand Seiz'd & possessed of & in one certaine parcell or tract of land cont:ne three hund:d & Sixty five acres as by patent dated the 2d: of Aprill 1685 granted under the hand of the Lord Howard EFFINGHAM may appear Scituate in the head of Sewards Creek in the parish [page break] [p.] (182) Parish afores.d And forasmuch as the said Jn.o & Thomas not only willing to Maintaine & preserve that brotherly love betwixt them, that now is on their owne behalf but Ever hereafter to themselves and posterity & to prevent all law Suites troubles and Imcumbrances between them & their heirs according to the Devise & desire of their Said father as by his Will Expressed [10 Jun 1672, Isle of Wight Co. Record of Wills, Deeds, Etc., Vol. 2, p. 111] two hund.d & fifty acres of the P'cel of land formerly belonging to their Said father the other one hund:d & fifteen Twice Surveyd & taken up by the Said Jn.o & Thomas & afterwards Joyned & included in y.e aboves.d patent according to its bounds, do acknowledge y.t [that] they the Said Jn.o & Thomas have made a deviding line of & in the s.d land w.ch s.d Devision according to the bounds hereafter Specified & Set downe in this Indenture shall be a Mutuall Established line and be taken to be their bounds in the Division of the above patent of land to them and their heirs for Ever That is to Say begining at a m'ked pohiccory standing near the Outside line & so along aline of marked trees to Some low ground and thrô the low ground along aline of m'ked trees to a branch Called the dry bridge branch & so along the Same lime of trees downe the Valley to the head of a Spring then along the water Courses to the Creek the land on the North Side the Said line to be and remaine to the Said Jn.o HARRIS & his heires for Ever And y.e land on the South Side the Said line to be & remaine to y.e Said Thomas & his heires for Ever w.th this Exception that the Rents accruing & becomeing due from Thomas DAVIS & his wife who now lives o part of the land on the South Side the line the one half the s.d rent to be and Enure to the proper use & behoof of the said John & his heires and after the Said Davise's decease to be & remaine w.th the whole land & appurtena's on the South Side y.e Said lines to the Said Thomas to him & his heires &c In Witness of the aboves.d Articles the above Said Jn.o & Thomas HARRIS do Interchangeably set their hands & Seales Dated this 26.th day of March 1711. John HARRIS ¤Seal¤ Thomas HARRIS ¤Seal¤ Signed Seal'd & Deliver'd in the presence of us Test Will BRIDGER John SCOTT ~ At a Court held for the Isle of Wight County the 26.th day of March 1711. Joh HARRIS & Thomas HARRIS Came into Court presented & acknowledged this their Deed Each to other and it admitted to record - Test H. LIGHTFOOT C.l C.ur [page continues Ralph HILL & Nicholas HILL appoint Mr. Joseph CHAPMAN to acknowledge a deed dated 25 Dec 1710 to Mr. Benjamin CHAPMAN. (Power of Attorney)] [page end] [There is no extant patent matching the description above (250a, 2 Apr 1685). Thomas HARRIS (Sr.) pat. 240a. adj. Mathew TOMLIN, 27 Mar 1686 (PB7:510-11).] Isle of Wight Co., VA, Record of Wills, Deeds, Etc., Vol. 2 (1661-1719), pp. 181-82 The Library of Virginia, Isle of Wight Co. Microfilm Reel 23 abstracted by Matt HARRIS [surname capitalization, line breaks & brackets mine] ___________________________________________________________________ Copyright. All rights reserved. http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm This file was contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives by: Matthew W. Harris Zoobug64@aol.com ___________________________________________________________________
Mill
- from Boddie’s 17th Century Isle of Wight County… Google Book)
- Jan. 13, 1663: John Bond sells Thomas Harris a corn mill at head of Pagan Creek (page 8). Teste, Henry King, Alice (X) Phillips (page 539).
- — Thomas Harris sells mill to Giles Driver.
- from this Yahoo discussion, providing notes concerning Thomas Harris d 1672
- Corn mill sold to Giles Driver on November 17, 1667
- 40 acres, 9 June 1664, Isle of Wight County, page 303 (273) At head of one of the branches of Pagan Creek, his own land on north east and land of FRANCIS SMITH on the southwest, Renewal of patent dated 19 August 1652.
- (Francis Hobbs was father to Margaret Hobbs who married John Harris. John Jennings was husband to Martha Harris, daughter of Robert Harris and niece of Thomas Harris Sr.)
- “John and Thomas Harris, 365 acres, Upper Parish of Isle of Wight County; on north side of the Ashen Swamp, near the head and on west side of Seaward’s Creek, 20 April 1685. Page 441. 250 acres part granted Nathaniel Loyd, 20 November 1637 and conveyed to said Harris’ father, by Captain Francis Hobbs and his wife, who was the relict and administratrix of said Loyd, 13 January 1659; and among other lands found to escheate; granted to Honorable Colonel Joseph Bridger 22 July 1678, who sold to said John and Thomas Harris the 6 February following (1679), to be equally divided according to their father’s will, dated last day of March 1672. 115 acres being waste land; and the whole beginning by a marsh near the head of Seaward’s Creek; near Colonel Bacon, Etc; due for the transportation of 3 persons.
- “Isle of Wight County, Virginia, Deed Book 2, 1704-1715;
- “Page 181. 26 March 1711. John Harris of the Upper Parish to Thomas Harris of the same, 365 acres (being land they owned jointly by patent dated 20 April 1685) on Seaward’s Creek. For brotherly love, they wish to divide this tract which consists of 250 acres taken up by their father (not named) and 115 acres which they, John and Thomas Harris, took up. Land adjoins Dry Bridge Branch and the north part is to go to John Harris and the south part is to go to Thomas Harris. Thomas Davis and wife now rent part of the land in the southern part. Witness: William Bridger and John Scott. Signed John Harris, Thomas Harris. Recorded 26 March 1711.”
Coleman notes
I am an ANDERSON researcher… therefore I do not have a dog in this fight. I can be ruthlessly objective. So… starting from scratch…
This is my supposition for the arrival of the “immigrant” Robert Coleman Sr. of Isle of Wight, Nansemond and Bath County, North Carolina: (also John Sellaway of IOW)
This patent date of 1670 does not verify the date of the arrival of Robert Coleman… it merely establishes that he did arrive… he was noted in IOW at least as early as 1665. Since this is noted as Surry, I feel confident this is not a Coleman of later Prince George county… a little devious skullduggery may be involved if Robert Sr claimed himself in 1667 and this character John Kindred used him also in 1670… it happened often. Bottom line… this proves that there WAS a headright. The mention of John Sellaway strengthens my supposition as Sellaway settled in IOW along with Robert Coleman.
Kindred, John. grantee.
Land grant 19 October 1670.
Summary Location: Surry County.
Description: 554 acres beginning and extending standing in Captain Coskerhams line.
Source: Land Office Patents No. 6, 1666-1679 (pt.1 & 2 p.1-692), p. 317 (Reel 6).
Abstract
Compare the headright list of Robert Coleman’s patent of 25 Sept, 1667:
David Jones, Saml. Ffuller, Robt. Coleman, Pete Ffrenchman, Rich Atkins, Jno. Sellaway and Saml. Dutton
This is “smoking gun” proof that Robert Coleman had the first headright and it is almost certain it was himself.
Who the hell was the frenchman? (just kidding). This is a clear example of what could be considered “fraud” of the headright system since the same people were claimed at least twice.
My guess is that Robert Coleman arrived in IOW about 1665 or a bit earlier. He was undoubtedly a young man considering his death date of 1722.
Below is the 1667 patent… a question is raised about the Robert Coleman listed in the headright list… my opinion is that he is simply listing himself. Hell… these olde pharts would claim a headright if they tripped and fell into a creek and had to swim to the other side and back. I think this was not an uncommon occurrence but am open to any proof otherwise. More to the point… this appears to be his first patent.. so it would be logical to claim himself even if he came from, say, Surry County.
1667 Robert Coleman patent
Coleman 634
To all… whereas… grant to Robert Coleman 630 and 4 acres… Isle of Wight… branch ahead? ye Cypress and running up to and across New Land south south East 330 poles, then by his? New Land west 364 1/2 poles (or 564?) and south by East 60 pole to Ruttd Land then West by south Ruttds L(?) 120 pole to a pine one of his Corner trees by a Pocoson then still by Ruttor and by the Pocoson south by East ??0 poles to a red oak then into yt pocoson west by south 216 pole then No: by west 104 pole In sd? Ruffons Land then by Ruffon’s Land East by N: 160 pole to a white oake in ye pocoson, then No: East 26 pole to a red oake (?) then No: 60 pole to a small red oake then 245 pole upon ye Miles End line of Bennetts and Smiths Land to a _ _ _e Oake in a Pond then down by Smiths Land No: No: west 320 pole to a _ Great Cypress swamp in ye Cyprus branch and soe downe ye Cyprus branch to ye first station. The said Land being due to ye said Coleman a_ full 300 acres by purchase from Ambrose Bennett and 334 acres ye residue [for] transportation of 7 persons
… dated the 25 of Sept 1667
David Jones, Saml. Ffuller, Robt. Coleman, Pete Ffrenchman, Rich Atkins, Jno. Sellaway and Saml. Dutton
Transcribed… Marc Anderson 2016
1665 mention…
Source: 17th Century, Isle of Wight County, VA., by John Bennett Boddie
MR. WILLIAM BODDIE, 3350 ACRES, 12 July 1665. At the head of the Cypress and Western Branches, beg. by the Beaver Dam, running N.E. to the meadow which makes the head of the Western Branch and to Coleman’s corner, E. by N. Nly to corner of Thomas Joyner near the head of the Elm Swamp. 550 acres by pat. dated 20 Oct. 1661, and 2800 for trans. of 56 pers. including himself, Mary Boddie, Ann Boddie and John Browne twice.
William Ruffin and Robert Coleman patent 938 acres, 1666… this land was in Isle of Wight on the Western Branch of the Nansemond River
About midway of this grouping… I see no way this can be disputed… (Ruffin sold his 1/2 interest in this patent)…
Below is in answer to a question ‘was this a distinctly “Nansemond” land patent’? It appears to be so… it seems to be directly on the boundary line. Remember that Robert Coleman is noted as having 1500 acres in the IOW 1704 Rent Roll. That Coleman died 1716. He had no sons. He did have nephews from his deceased brother Stephen mentioned in the will abstract.
ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY, VA – DEEDS – Miles LEWIS to Robert COLEMAN
12 Sep 1678
Assignment of Patent
Miles LEWIS to William THOMPSON
12 Sep 1678
Power of Attorney
—-¤¤¤—-
[p.] 388 […]
On the Backside of A Pattent granted to Miles LEWIS by S.r William BERKLEY K.t
late Gov’n.r of Virginia for four hundred Acres of Land lyeing in Nanzmond
County is this following surrender Vizt
Know all men by these p’sents that I Miles LEWIS Sonne & heir of Richard LEWIS
formerly of Chuckatuck deceast for A valluable consideraçon to me in hand p.d
have & doe by these p’sents Assigne & make over unto M.r Rob.t COLEMAN of the
Isle of Wight County & his heires for ever all my right Title & interest w.ch
is due to me in the Land within this Pattent specified
giveing & by these p’sents granting unto him the s’d COLEMAN A gen’all
warranty from me & my heires in Confirmaçon of w.ch I have hereunto subscribed
my hand & fixt my seal this 12.th day of Sept.r 1678
Signed
Miles M LEWIS Sigill
Signed Sealed & deliv’ed in
y.e p’sence of us Acknowledged in Open Co.rt y.e 9.th day of October
W.m THOMPSON 1678
James TULLAGH Test Jn.o BROMFEILD Cler Cur
[page end]
[p.] 389
Memd. underneath the afores’d Assignment from Miles LEWIS to
M.r Rob.t COLEMAN is this following Lre of Attorney vizt
Know all men by these p’sents that I Miles LEWIS doe nominate & appoint W.m
THOMPSON of Chuckatuck to be my true & lawfull attorney for for me & in my
place & stead [“put” struck through] to Acknowledge the above Assignem.t att
the next Co.rt held for the Isle of Wight County to the above mençoned m.r
Rob.t COLEMAN, according to the true intent of the same
giving & by these p’sents granting to my s’d Attorney full power & Authority
for the Executing y.e same as if I my selfe were P/sonally p’sent
In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed My hand & fixt my seal this
12.th day of September 1678 Signed
Miles M LEWIS Sigill
Signed Sealed & deliv’ed in
y.e p’sence of us
James TULLAGH Proved in Co.rt the 9.th day of October 1678,
Benja: BEAL by y.e Witnesses Oaths
Test Jn.o BROMFEILD Cler Cur
[The 400-acre tract conveyed above was patented 29 Jan 1667/8 by Miles &
Richard LEWIS, “orphants of Richard LEWIS dec’ed.” Two copies appear-
PB6:105, extremely faint in online image, with right margin obscure, &
PB7:629, which has several blank gaps in the text.
Both patents describe the land as lying in Nansemond Co., so it is unclear
why this transaction was recorded in Isle of Wight Co.
This tract & adjoining waste land were included in a 530-acre patent granted
to Robert COLEMAN, 20 Apr 1684 (PB7:378); no county was given there.]
Isle of Wight Co., VA, Record of Wills, Deeds, Etc., Vol. 1 (1662-1715),
pp. 388-89
The Library of Virginia, Isle of Wight Co. Microfilm Reel 22
abstracted by Matt HARRIS [surname capitalization, line breaks & brackets mine]
see also
Virginia Land Office, Patent Book 6 (1666-1679), p. 105
The Library of Virginia, Virginia Land Office Patent and Grant Database,
Image 006_0107.tif
Virginia Land Office, Patent Book 7 (1679-1689), pp. 384, 629
The Library of Virginia, Virginia Land Office Patent and Grant Database,
Images 007_0385.tif & 007_0635.tif
___________________________________________________________________
Copyright. All rights reserved.
http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm
This file was contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives
by: Matthew W. Harris Zoobug64@aol.com
___________________________________________________________________
The above 530 acres plots out as this… (the boundary line between points 3 and 4 may be the Nansemond County line)
It is on my Isle of Wight map (and obviously needs to be adjusted to the East and probably North some what) After all the sparks have settled it probably straddles the IOW and Nansemond county line… (which causes all the confusion). Refer to the IOW base map… there are two branches off of Chuckatuck Creek… see map
https://andersonnc.wordpress.com/isle-of-wight-map/
Note in that area two patents… one for J.Neville and another for Christopher Wade… each adjoins a Robert Coleman. This patent likely is the one.
And one last gasp of a record for this property which references Robert Coleman in 1716…
IOW Will Book II
(pg.46 26 Jan— Alexander Campbell of Chuckatuck Parish in Nansemond County to Robert Driver of Isle of Wight County…. 100 acres or 200 acres (?) (being 1/2 of the tract granted Miles Lewis and Richard Lewis on 29 Jan 1667) and bounded by Robert Coleman.
Wit: William Wiggs and Samuel Seldon
Rec: 28 Jan 1716 Alexander Campbell
Apparently Alexander Campbell had acquired half of the original patent from the Lewis brothers… note above that it was “bounded” by Coleman.
ahhh… here:
Oct. 19, 1687. Richard Lewis now of Lower Norfolk [Nansemond after all the dust settles] sells to John Campbell of Nansemond his share of said patent. 17 Feb. 1687-88. John Campbell sells same to his brother Wm. Campbell April 9, 1689.
===============================================
IOW land
May 1666, William Ruffin and Robert Coleman [450 acres] patented 938 acres of land in Isle of Wight County adjacent to Thomas Harris. 1668, William Ruffin sold to Thomas POPE 450 acres out of the 900 acres patented by him and Robert Coleman.
Ruffin article from 1910… (was there a connection to Ruffin or was this purely a business deal?)
https://archive.org/details/jstor-1922552
Coleman, Robert. grantee.
Land grant 25 September 1667.
Summary Location: Isle of Wight County.
Description: 634 acres beg.g &c. in a branch called the Cyprus.
3 Nov 1677. John Smyth and Anne his wife sold 500 acres land adj. Robert Coleman and Thomas Smith to Robert Coleman. [From Boddie’s Seventeenth Century Isle of Wight VA:
Page 573: John Smyth, planter, and wife Anne sell to Peter Best his plantation that he lives on 100 acres adj. Robert Coleman and his brother Thomas Smyth from the Cypress for a mile into the woods.July 31, 1675. ] So this seems to be IOW.
A 1679 purchase that I have not verified…
09 Nov 1679 (Isle of Wight W&DI) Geo. EDSON son of Geo. EDSON, dec., whereas Col. John UPTON with consent of wife Margaret by deed 13 Aug. 1647, did sell to John MASON a certain parcel of land between Wm. WRIGHT, George LEVERING and John HERRING, and it was by John MASON conveyed to Robert DUSTER, and when he died he left it in fee to his wife Alcewho married Edward PALMER and they sold to Thomas EDSON and now Geo. EDSON, son of Thomas, sells to Robert COLEMAN. 9 Nov. 1679.
Seventeenth Century Isle of Wight Will and Deed Book I by Boddie
Coleman, Robert. grantee.
Land grant 20 April 1684.
Summary Location: County location not given.
Description: 530 acres on the west side of Reedy Marsh, being a branch of Chuckatuck. 400 acres part there of formerly gtd. to Richd. and Miles Lewis, Jany. 29. 1667.
Coleman, Robert. grantee.
Land grant 21 April 1695.
Summary Location: Isle of Wight County.
Description: 80 acres in the lower parish. Adjoining land of Thomas Jordan, and Giles Driver.
To be truthful… every time I try to grasp this upper/lower parish gibberish it makes my head hurt. I think the upper/lower business was reversed in Nansemond… you figure it out… I have given up. I’m pretty sure Jordan and Driver were firmly in IOW.
===============================================
Nansemond Land
Coleman, Robert. grantee.
Land grant 28 October 1697.
Summary Location: Nansemond County.
Description: 450 acres near Wickham swamp, adjoining the land of Thomas and John Milner.
Odier, Dennis. grantee.
Land grant 23 October 1703.
Summary Location: Nansemond County.
Description: 119 acres near a place called the South key, adjoining the land of Robert Coleman.
From Boddie’s Seventeenth Century Isle of Wight VA: pg.593
John Marshall with consent of wife Susanna sells to Robert Coleman 250 acres at Strickland’s Bridge on Beaver Dam, etc. (no date). Wm. Bressie This is tricky… my first guess is this is near Kingsale Swamp… there is a Beaver Dam branch nearby… also William Strickland had land adjoining the Beaver Dam. Hence a possible “Strickland’s Bridge”.
Marshall had 4 patents: one is designated “IOW”… another “Lower Norfolk”…… So my assumption is this is Nansemond, but if I am correct that it was near the Strickland patent then it is several miles into IOW???
Marshall, John.
Land grant 28 January 1662.
1662
Marshall, John.
Land grant 8 June 1655.
1655
Marshall, John.
Land grant 16 April 1653.
1653
Marshall, John.
Land grant 4 May 1652.
Marshall also made several “purchase” patents … so he was all over the map… aside from being a “notorious rebel” in Bacon’s Rebellion. My kind of guy!
My hunch is the property was near the Orange area… perhaps between J Allen and Wm Mayo? Or not… I don’t know.
So… considering the 1704 Rent Rolls
1500 acres Rob Coleman in IOW
1400 acres Rob Coleman in Nansemond
If you take the 1684 “Chuckatuck” patent 530 acres and consider it Nansemond then the math almost works out. Since it may be that that patent “straddled” the county line then it makes sense.
_________
With that nifty and “somewhat” objective analysis being stated, I pretty much consider it bunk. I think the “Chuckatuck” and the John Marshall property were each in IOW. That gives well over 2,000 acres during the 1704 IOW Rent Roll. I think all these men simply lied (well, let’s say “understated” to be nice) about their holdings. The going rate for taxes was about 2 shillings for every 50 acres. It was in each man’s financial interest to claim as little land as possible. Add to that that many areas of these tracts were unusable swamp land and everyone knew that. I think there was a wink and a nod among these gents come Quitrent time. Tally up some other folks actual holdings and compare it to the Rent Roll and judge for yourself. Most of these men were illiterate but they were no stupid.
I think it highly likely that the other land records of Robert Coleman of Nansemond burned with the various fires and the records are lost.
To further complicate the 1704 Rent Roll totals Robert Coleman “deserted” his 1667 patent of 634 acres by 1698 when it was re-granted to Hugh Campbell…
===============================================
Below are two 1706 references of interest… one is for who I think is the Dennis Odien/Odier who later wound up adjoining a Robert Coleman near South Key in Nansemond proper near the Blackwater River.
Dennis “Obryon” in IOW… his name is butchered every time it is written… must have been a hairlipped Frenchman… (just kidding!) Of course, we have to wonder if he actually signed his name… but I seriously doubt it. In my rummaging thru several hundred of the early patents, I cannot recall the first name “Dennis”… please correct my aging memory if I am making an ass of myself…particularly after the very un-politically correct hairlip joke. Apologies to any Frenchmen also. And any French ladies of course. [my point is he may have had an accent] Was Odien pronounced Oh-Dye-en?
[oops… there was a Dennis WILLIAMS in IOW … I am ashamed of myself and stand corrected]
the Bath will… (I note he signed with a mark so any thoughts of comparing signatures are out… the “marks” are open to compare though).
I checked Wills and Administrations of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, 1647 …, Books 1-3 By Blanche Adams Chapman for John Butler and my computer almost blew up from the hits for him in Isle of Wight…. I can take a hint, Mr. Butler was from IOW… (Mr. Butler also was on the will of Robert Coleman d.1716, per the abstract)
Likewise for Peter Green… Sheesh…
Per Bob Baird’s “Reynolds” research… “Note that Richard Casey witnessed this entry. He was presumably the same Richard Casey who married Jane Reynolds, daughter of Richard and Joyce Reynolds.”
Course.. the question is what was the old man Coleman doing in IOW writing his will, nearing his deathbed?
Some bullet points concerning the will:
- His wife was the mother of Dennis Odier/Odien/Obryon
- A daughter married Christopher Reynolds
- A daughter married a Dupuise
- A daughter married a White
- A daughter married a Isler
This is getting interesting and I can see that some map work needs to be done…Again, reading Bob Baird’s site, he mentions a couple of patents to a Christopher Reynolds which just happen to be within a few miles of the Coleman patents near South Key in Nansemond. Which leaves obvious questions of where Coleman’s land at South Key wound up after his death. Since Nansemond is a burned records county there may be no answers. But then IOW is a wealth of information…. you just have to put the pieces together.
25 Aug 1731 Land Patent: Christopher Reynolds, 15s, 105 acres in the upper parish of Nansemond County, on the north side of the Nottoway River “…beginning at a holley on the river side… a corner tree of William Fowler’s patent thence due south 98 poles bounding upon the said patent… to Nottoway River thence down the said River and bounding thereon to the first station” [Virginia Patent Book 14, p297]
Note that “the upper parish of Nansemond” is, well, not upper…it is LOWER dammit… but hey, we go with the flow… right? Isle of Wighters looked UP and Nansemonders looked DOWN… or something… I dunno.
17 Sep 1731 Land Patent: Thomas Woodley, Richard Williams, Christopher Reynolds, and Francis Woodley of Isle of Wight County, 30s, 272 acres “in the uper (sic) parish of Nansemond County and in the fork of the Nottoway & Blackwater Rivers and bounded as followeth…beginning at a hickory on the north side of Nottoway River thence down the said River the several courses thereof and bounding thereon to the mouth thereof, thence up the Blackwater River the several courses thereof and bounding thereon to a white oak standing on the south side thereof thence bounding upon a patent granted Andrew Woodley and Thomas Woodley 15 poles to the first station [Virginia Patent Book 14, p351-2]
Mr. Baird is of the opinion the “Christifer Runnills” of the Bath will remained in IOW. I concur. This reference from Mr. Baird sums it up and I see no reason to re-invent the wheel… his research is spot on. This is 20 years after the death of Christifer Runnills….
“””””””””5 Jul 1753 Deed:
Christopher Reynolds, his wife Mary Reynolds and Ann Hunt to John Marshall, Jr., 250 acres (being part of the land willed by Robert Coleman) adjoining the main swamp, Stricklins Bridge and the Beaverdam Swamp. Signed: Christopher Reynolds, Mary (x) Reynolds and Ann (x) Hunt. Witnesses: Thomas Gale and Christopher Reynolds. Recorded same date. [Isle of Wight Deed Book 9, p156 abstracted by Hopkins]
Christopher Reynolds, husband of Ann Coleman, who was willed this land, died in 1732. This is his son Christopher Reynolds, married to Mary, who is selling both parcels. He had inherited the land because he was the eldst son of an intestate father. Ann Hunt has to be his widowed mother, releasing her dower interest in the land of her deceased husband. (She has obviously remarried to a Hunt then been widowed again.) The Christopher Reynolds who witnessed the deed is probably his first cousin.“”””””””””””
This 250 acres “adjoining the main swamp, Stricklins Bridge and the Beaverdam Swamp” is no doubt the same land purchased by Robert Coleman from John Marshall Sr.. The Ann Hunt mentioned above is the daughter of Robert Coleman d.1722 in Bath… after the death of “Christifer Runnills” in 1732 she re-married to Hunt. This essentially proves that the property mentioned was in IOW… also proving Ann as the daughter of Coleman.
This also leads me to assume that Robert Coleman seems to have returned to IOW and Nansemond to settle his property prior to his death. My hunch is that there were separate Nansemond settlement records which are lost… up in smoke.
If you add two sons to the above bullet points of the Bath Will then I think it sums up the IOW and Nansemond Robert Colemans. The old man was both.
Robert Coleman Sr d.1722
- Robert Jr d.1716
- Stephen d.1691
- A daughter married Christopher Reynolds (Ann)
- A daughter married a Dupuise
- A daughter married a White
- A daughter married a Isler
If you consider the date of his first patent, 1667, and assume he was 21 or so then his birth would be perhaps 1646. All of which adds up to a plausible lifespan (76 yrs).
This explains the sparse records for Stephen Coleman (he did not have time to leave any records)… he must have been in his early twenties when he died in 1691 (if born 1668). His sons were infants at his death. Robert Jr would have been perhaps 48 or 49 at his death in 1716 (if born 1667).
Here I go speculating again… if son Stephen was born prior to 1667 then his father would most likely have named him as a headright along with his brother Robert Jr. on his 1667 patent.
_____________________________________________
1716 Will of Robert Coleman Jr. in IOW (sent by friend Jerry Jolly… not sure of the source?)
Below, in my humble opinion, is irrefutable proof that Robert Coleman Jr was the brother in law of Christopher Reynolds who married Ann Coleman, daughter of Robert Coleman Sr. Robert Coleman Sr designated Christopher Reynolds as his son in law in his Bath Will of 1722. The date of “1615/1616(?)” below is clearly a mistake as the abstractor (Hopkins) notes with the question mark. This is without a doubt referring to the record of the will of Robert Coleman Jr in 1716. I very seldom use the word “irrefutable”… this simply cannot be disputed.
—————————————
It is not my want or desire to criticize other researchers… particularly if I find it a harmless misinterpretation. But when a misinterpretation spreads, it causes confusion. Such as this:
In her book The Coleman Family of Mobjack Bay Virginia, Nicol, 1998, p. 43 records the fact another Robert Coleman, of Isle of Wight County, Virginia transported a headright Robert Coleman receiving land 29 Sep 1667 for the fact.
This misinterpretation has led to a “phantom” Robert Coleman conjured up out of thin air. I suppose the theory is supported by the possibility of missing records burned in Nansemond. But a theory needs to be supported by evidence… otherwise it just hangs around like a single sock left from the laundry.
I am not an expert and it is still open to debate whether or not another Robert Coleman was imported. I strongly disagree with the above statement and further state that it is not a “fact”. My opinion is that Robert Coleman either 1, claimed himself, or 2, claimed his son Robert who, again in my opinion, was an infant.
Once again I defer to Bob Baird:
” There were no restrictions on age or gender. Headrights could be, and often were, children. Indeed, many if not most imported indentured servants were teenagers.”
Below is a sample headright from Chowan “precinct” in NC… it is just coincidence that this Francis Rountree later is associated with Colemans in 1739…
You jst have to chukkle at the speling…
Another random headright showing “children” to reinforce my point… this is from 1698… this is Chowan but the rules were similar to IOW and Nansemond…
Some of these humbell petisions…… almost……..involved……… bribery…
All of which explains my interest in the sons of Stephen Coleman (mentioned in the will of Robert Coleman Jr d.1716) possibly being the progenitor(s) of the Colemans who hailed from east of the Chowan River in North Carolina. Well into the period even after the 1728 boundary expedition of William Byrd II… the area of Chowan “Precinct” was referred to as “Nansemond”. And as I tirelessly reiterate… most of those records are up in smoke. We are left grasping at straws… which is why I MAP to expose lost relationships.
The death of Robert Coleman Jr in 1716 and the death of Robert Coleman Sr in 1722 was the “end of the line” for male descendants … with only one possible exception… the “possibility” that the noted sons of Stephen Coleman lived on and had sons of their own.
For that reason, I find it perplexing why anyone would claim a relationship to either of the Robert Colemans of IOW. How can a DNA claim be made? At this time I have seen no proof whatsoever connecting any NC Coleman to those mystery sons of Stephen. Prove me wrong with a linkage.
Stephen Coleman… not much to go on…
7 Aug 1671, Stephen witnessed a deed(Charles City Co. Court Orders, p. 534)
The 1671 date removes this guy from my consideration… Charles Cittie at this time was being carved up into separate counties…
Surry County [Virginia] Tithables, 1668-1703 By Edgar MacDonald, Richard Slatten
1689…from Sunken marsh upwards
Stephen Coleman… 1
(listed between Henry Hollinsworth, 1 and Jno: Wilkisson, 3)
I re-checked the “tithables” back to 1686 and up to 1691… this is the only mention of Stephen Coleman in those records.
27 Jan 1691, the Surry Co. Records 1687-1694, p. 291 list an inventory of Stephen’s estate
Below is a partial map of some Nansemond patents. Several relate to Coleman and Reynolds (both father and son). As I continue developing these maps, particularly these Nansemond patents, the neighbors are often mentioned in the details. Something may turn up…
Bob Baird makes a plausible case that the “Cabbin Swamp” or “branch” noted in the Robert Reynolds patent is further south… below Summerton Creek. I too have seen references in that area (I just can’t remember the specifics… I think they are in some Chowan patents in NC). The reason I have Reynolds where he is is because of the Dr. Henry Jenkins patent… note the “Back Swamp” and the “Cabbin Branch” in his patent. I am quite prepared to move him if it turns out there is a Cabbin Swamp which indeed “issues out of Chowan River”.
I have also seen references to a Cabbin Swamp in Southampton County… this stuff gets tedious.
An interesting history of South Quay shown on the map above…
_________________________
Desperation sources…
Whenever I have to venture into the desolate ashes of the records for Nansemond I have a few sources… this is one:
I found NOTHING for a Coleman .. darnnit! But, who knows, as this search continues a neighbor might become important…
source: http://archive.org/stream/southsidevirgini219834/southsidevirgini219834_djvu.txt
The title of the article is “Losses To The British in Nansemond County, 1782” page 104 or so…
I also checked the Chancery records for Isle of Wight … found nothing of relevance to these Colemans… (much older records are sometimes cited)
There is however a court case from 1904 that mentions a Henry Coleman from 1870 or so… it may be of interest to someone… you never know where a record might pop up…
http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=093-1904-006
Likewise a Nansemond case of 1909… mentions Colemans from mid 1800s… but, as I see it, these folks had to have a daddy…
http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=901-1909-026
I have not exhausted the Chancery records… do some digging…
John Browne (the Indian Trader)… and his wayward granddaughter
I’m like a little kid when I find a “proof”… I’m rushing this map… I “should” wait until I develop it some more.
To hell with that.
The facts speak for themselves… click several times to enlarge…
Here is the background…
https://andersonnc.wordpress.com/john-browne-of-kingsale-1639-1713-indian-trader/
This is why I am strutting around like a rooster… the hunches, the theory, and the facts align just like …. well…. a map!
This was my conundrum… grabbed from the link above…
Other researchers have attempted to tie John Joyner, son of Bridgeman Joyner, to a 2nd marriage to one Eizabeth Brown. I suggest that if there is a connection of an Elizabeth Brown it may have been a daughter, or more likely a granddaughter, of John Browne. This John Browne relocates to North Carolina about 1700 near Wiccacon Creek, along with Richard Booth and Booth’s nephew Thomas Mann, Jr.
This account by Boddie gets my attention… well actually it just confuses the hell out of me… Boddie made a lot of helpful notes but DAMN! sometimes he was just WRONG!
Historical Southern Families Vol. 1
Pg. 23 John Brown died in Surry Co. 1714, wife Eliza Brown 6-6-1714 left 1 son and 4 daughters as follows: (Not the Browne I chronicle)
1. Sylvester Brantley Bertie Co. NC (is this a typo?… is this a step-son?… is this a female?)
2 Hester Brantley, the will of Hester probated in 1727 in Surry Co. VA mentioned her daughters Priscilla and Elizabeth and her 2 sisters Eliza Joyner and Grace Warren. Appoints James Wilson and James Piland executors.
3 Eliza married to Nehemiah Joyner (is this an Elizabeth Brown different from the one I am researching?… if so this can get VERY confusing!))
4 Grace married John Warren of Bertie Co. NC
5 Susannah Brown
There is a missing link here… I’m wondering if it may be a son John Jr that left this will in Surry County? (Nope)
—————-
That account has caused speculation of a JOYNER connection to these deeds in North Carolina in 1727… (this is where I begin to differ with Boddie)
Mary Best Bell, Colonial Bertie County, NC, DB A-H, 1720-1757
Bell, C 167(160) Susanah Brown, John Warren & wife Grace, Sylvester Brown and ____ to Elizabeth Joyner
Feb. 12, 1727/28. *. 256 A. “…love… for our sister Elizabeth Joyner…” Land formerly belonging to our father, John Brown dec’d. Patent July 28, 1713. On WS Chowan adj. J. Curlee, J. Smith. Wit: Fincher Hayne, Charles Brown. Court *. Thomas Crew D. C/C.
(I note that this does not state that their father died in 1713… it merely says the patent is dated 1713)
C 171 Susanna Brown & Sylvester Brown to William Evans Nov 22, 1729. 5 pds for 100 A. On Horse swamp. Adj. John Thomas, Lazarus Thomas. Wit: Richard Williford, Mary Luden (Laden?). Feb Court 1729. Thomas Crew D. C/C.
and again in 1741…
F 344 Soloman Joyner of Edgecombe Co., & John Joyner & wife Elizabeth of Isle of Wight Co, Va. to Joseph Witherington of Surry Co, Va. Feb 7, 1741. 25 pds, for 256 A. A Patent granted John Brown for 256 A. July 28, 1713 on “Bank of the River” adj. James Curlee, John Smyth Wit: James Washington, Henry Crafford, Morning Crafford, John Sherard, William Plyant, John Fort (FOORT). May Court 1742. Thomas Crew C/C.
So the Elizabeth Joyner who received the Brown property by gift in 1727 was the wife of John Joyner… (of Isle of Wight in 1741)
all of which relates to this patent…
Margaret Hoffman, PROVINCE OF NORTH CAROLINA ABSTRACTS OF LAND PATENTS 1663-1729
3313 pg. 285 John Brown date (not given) 256 acres on the W. side of Chowan River, joining the bank of ye river, James Courlee, and John Smith Witnesses: (not given)
The half dozen patents before and after that one are in the date range of 1713-1716… so logic dictates that the date of July 28, 1713 is probably correct and was referenced in the later deeds… my problem with this is a “death” reference for “a” John Brown in 1713 (Hathawy).
” John Browne dead. April 7, 1713.”, p. 34, Vol. 1, The North Carolina historical and genealogical register. If this is the same guy then the patent may have been issued after his death OR it was perhaps re-issued to a son of the same name. My theory is that it was devised to a John Brown Junior. And this is the John Brown that died sometime before 1727 and was the father of the Brown children who gifted the property to their sister Elizabeth who married John Joyner of Isle of Wight.
Now I haven’t exactly pulled this John Brown Junior out of thin air… I do have some proof. The references below are in Isle of Wight where John Browne and son previously lived:
3 Jun 1690…. John Browne, the Elder, to Richard Shewll…. 100 acres (being part of 600 acres) on Broadneck Swamp adjoining Wolf Pit Branch.
Wit: Edward (X) Floid, Henry Baker and Thomas (X) Wickins.
2 Dec 1692…. John Browne, Sr. appoints John Browne as his attorney in the difference with Capt. Hugh Campbell.
Wit: Daniel Leigh and Mary (X) Browne
Consider this deed of Susanna Brown & Sylvester Brown again from 1729… mention of Lazaris Thomas… note where he and they seem to be living:
C 171 Susanna Brown & Sylvester Brown to William Evans Nov 22, 1729. 5 pds for 100 A. On Horse swamp. Adj. John Thomas, Lazarus Thomas. Wit: Richard Williford, Mary Luden (Laden?). Feb Court 1729. Thomas Crew D. C/C.
The property above is not on my map yet…
______________________________________________________
JAMES PEEK to JOHN WARREN, Aug 9 1727, 10 pds for 100 a. SS Chowan River, adj. LAURANCE MARTIN,LAZARUS THOMAS at Horse Swampe. Wit: John Beverley, John Sutton. November Court 1729, (Bertie Co Deed Book C p181)
JOHN EARLY to DAVID RYAN, heir of THOMAS RYAN, deceased. 1754, 350 a.. for discharge of a bond from John Early to Thomas Ryan land between JAMES WILKON’s line and the Holley Swamp at Horse Swamp” adj. ISAAC LEWIS, JAMES WILLIAMSON, LAZARUS THOMAS, WILLIAM WARREN to the Wiccacon Swamp. Wit: John Cricket, Thomas Kinsey, John Nichols Jr. Aug Court 1754 (Bertie Co Deed Book H p111)
Note that John Warren was in the 1727 deed with Susanna Brown and Sylvester Brown gifting the property to Elizabeth Joyner…
Charles Merrit was an old croney Indian Trader with John Brown and Richard Booth. After Booth moved to North Carolina Charles Merritt located near by… (see Deep Creek on the map above). The merchant, James Peake sold a chunk of land to John Warren (also at Deep Creek).
BK B PG. 112
1715 – Elinor Merrett/Meriet to William Nixon/Mixon (melton) 16 Apr 1715 p of atty to act in open Court 130 A for ye said William Merret unto James Peeke. Witnesses: Peter Evens, Rich Barfield.
Ellinor Merritt to Wm. Mixon. Power of Attorney to acknowledge deed to Rich’d Barefield for land sold by my husband Charles Merritt and Peter Evans to said Barefield, 280 acres on Deep Creek branch, Test. Wm. Mixon, Peter Evans.
Same to acknowledge deed to James Peake, of Boston, Executed by my husband Charles Merritt for 130 acres on south side of Chowan River, at ye mouth of Deep Branch; Apl. 16, 1715. Test, Peter Evans, Richard Barefield (NCHGR 138).
…from will of James Peake 1728…
“Item my will is that my executors hereafter mentioned do grant & give to
John Warren of the precinct a good and lawfull deed for one hundred acres of
land that he now lives on he paying at his ens__ling the said deed Tenn
pounds currant mony of North Carolina not withstanding not withstanding
(sic) any thing that is before mentioned to the contrary.”
_______________________________________________________________________
Now for the icing on the cake…
http://docsouth.unc.edu/csr/index.html/document/csr02-0132#p2-264
Minutes of the General Court of North Carolina
North Carolina. General Court
August 02, 1716
——————– page 264 ——————–
Wee the body of the Grand Jury for Albemarle County in the Province of North Carolina do present Charity Brown for that she hath a Bastard Child at the House of Mr Thoss Rogers in this Precinct of Chowan
(I have no idea who “Charity” belonged to)
Also in Currytuck Precinct one Edwd Boune leaving a wife in Virginia and keeps a whore in this Governmt by which it very plain appears that She hath severall Bastards by him the sd Boune.
Also one Susanah Brown living at Petty Shore hath two Bastards
(BINGO! this little lady may be the straw to break the brick wall)
Information of Capt Jno Worley also who keeps in his house the wife of Jno Hawkins she having severall children Contrary to Law.
JOSph SANDERSON
Adjourned to the Court in Course
C. GALE Ch: Just:
——————-
I found another specific reference to her in Hofmann’s Chowan Precinct…1696-1723, pg 218. This record is the minutes of Chowan Court July 1715. This is 2 years after I “suppose” John Brown Sr died. (But per the later records she would fit as a granddaughter and not a daughter)
“Whereas Susannah Brown (?), by her Oath on ye Holy Evangelist, Declared that John M—— is father to a bastard Child born to her, it is Ordered that the Marshall have the bodys of the sd. M—— and the sd. Susannah Brown at the next Court”.
(3 “M” neighbors nearby were Mann, Mayner (Maner Manear) and Merritt… the abstractor left 6 “dashes” because she did not feel confident of the letters to make a judgement… when I do abstracts I try to make the “dashes” relate to the letters I cannot read……. just sayin’)
Which begs the question… is this the same Susannah Brown 12 years later… and still not married? (deed referred to above)
Bell, C 167(160) Susanah Brown, John Warren & wife Grace, Sylvester Brown and ____ to Elizabeth Joyner
Feb. 12, 1727/28. *. 256 A. “…love… for our sister Elizabeth Joyner…” Land formerly belonging to our father, John Brown dec’d. Patent July 28, 1713. On WS Chowan adj. J. Curlee, J. Smith. Wit: Fincher Hayne,Charles Brown. Court *. Thomas Crew D. C/C.
(I have no idea who this “Charles Brown” is… )
____________________________________________
Case closed.
See here for some of the “historic” background of some of these Indian Traders… (and some of my stumbling and fumbling)…
https://andersonnc.wordpress.com/roanoke-r-to-chowan-1863-civil-war-map/
…
update++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I found this partial list of landowners of Chowan “Precinct”… written in 1720…
There are four references to “Petty Shore”. When John Browne obtained his patent in 1713, the adjoining property was listed as “James Curlee”. By this 1720 patent list it seems George Wyn(n) may have obtained property nearby. Another reference is a “Edmund Wiggans” which also ties to the patent (adjoining). The Stephen Williams mentioned is a son of Lewis Williams … his property was nearby. The other Abraham Bullet fella I have no idea who he was. (update: this fella is Abraham Blewlet… his patent was for 640ac in 1714… his land appears to be between James Curlee and Lewis Williams). see my ongoing map below…
https://andersonnc.wordpress.com/old-chowan-precinct-map/
While searching around for clues I find this…
Papers of Wynn at East Carolina University
https://digital.lib.ecu.edu/special/ead/findingaids/0691-002
Papers (1800-1961) of Hertford County, NC, family, consisting of correspondence, legal documents, financial papers, estate papers, account books, ledgers and time books, and miscellany, including records of Petty Shore Fishery and the family cotton business.
“During 1863 and 1864, several letters were received from Wynns’ Uncle James Dean Wynns, telling of the elder Wynns’ ill health and reporting that Yankee troops had taken all of his clothes, leaving him destitute and in great need of assistance. Other Civil War-era correspondence includes several leaves of absence granted to Wynns (most allowing him to attend the North Carolina State Legislature sessions,) a statement of receipt of supplies and money given to Wynns, an official letter from Adjutant General Daniel(?) Fowle authorizing Wynns to enlist another 250 or more mounted infantry troops, a few letters discussing issues related to age limits of the enlisted and some general orders. Other topics of particular interest in the correspondence include activities at Petty Shores Fishery…”
So I think it safe to assume the Petty Shore property stayed in the hands of WYNN heirs… A WYNN daughter seems to have married a Peter Evans. A son or brother of Peter Evans was one Robert Evans…
July 10, 1715 Chowan Prect. At a court in the house of HENRY KING.
“Tredle KEEF and JOHN MAINER being attached (?) of a Breach of trust reposed in him by the Publick, it is ordered that the Marshall take ye sd. Keef and Mainer into Custody until they give bond to appear at ye Next Generall Court and that ROBERT EVANS on PETTY SHORE AND THOMAS BROWN (?) and JAMES RUTTLAND be Summoned Evidences on behalf of the Soverign Lord the King.
Deed Book B #1 Chowan Co. Abstract by Hofmann, pg. 217
John Mainer (Manner, etc) also had property adjoining John Browne.
I propose that the above mentioned Thomas Brown is the son of John Browne (Indian Trader). Thomas Brown died about 1718 or 19.
_______________________________________________
Update…
I think the guy below is James Brown Jr… son of the Indian Trader. I will place his property on my old Chowan Precinct map as time permits.
As usual with these Browns, the sale is undated. So again we are left guessing. But a clue is left as low hanging fruit to easily grab… “John Brown, of Bertie…”
History. The county was formed as Bertie Precinct in 1722 from the part of Chowan Precinct of Albemarle County lying west of the Chowan River. It was named for James Bertie, his brother Henry Bertie, or perhaps both, each having been one of the Lords Proprietors of Carolina.
So logic dictates he died sometime after 1722 and before 1728 (when his children sold the Petty Shore property noted below).
Feb. 12, 1727/28. *. 256 A. “…love… for our sister Elizabeth Joyner…” Land formerly belonging to our father, John Brown dec’d. Patent July 28, 1713. On WS Chowan adj. J. Curlee, J. Smith. Wit: Fincher Hayne, Charles Brown. Court *. Thomas Crew D. C/C.
Another reference for John Brown in Bertie in 1722:
http://files.usgwarchives.net/nc/bertie/deeds/cattle.txt
Since he sold the 286 acres near the Nansemond, VA state line… where was he living? He is noted as “of Bertie” and the Petty Shore property ceased to be of Chowan and became Bertie County in 1722. When I map his property near Nansemond you will note he had an adjoining neighbor named Benjamin Rogers. The Brown and Rogers associations are not easily ignored. My hunch is there were intermarriages.
From the 1716 deposition…
“Wee the body of the Grand Jury for Albemarle County in the Province of North Carolina do present Charity Brown for that she hath a Bastard Child at the House of Mr Thoss Rogers in this Precinct of Chowan” (Note that I am not accusing Thomas Rogers of knocking the girl up… he may have simply been a friend or relative looking after her welfare).
This map is pretty accurate if I have correctly identified Beech Swamp… note that the John Brown patent was issued 1719 (6 years after I think Browne Sr died). My theory is Thomas and John Brown Jr were brothers. Thomas died about 1719 in what was then Bertie County, NC. (Thomas also had a son named John but I do not think this is him). Refer to the land gift/sale transactions to understand my theory that John Brown JR removed from this area to the Petty Shore, NC property.
The yellow patents were issued in Virginia. White patents were issued in NC. This map is obviously incomplete… the southerly patents are temporarily placed…
To re-hash a bit… (refer to the Petty Shore map top of post)
Hathaway listed the death of “a” John Browne in 1713…
This reference is who I think his widow was:
Deed Bk W #1, Chowan Co., NC, Hofmann
#321 pg. 154 BRIDGETT BROWN of Chowan Prect. to ISAAC LEWIS of ye Co. of Albemarle, my well beloved Son 15 July 1713 Letter of Attorney to prosecute to Judgement any person I, the sd. BRIDGETT BROWN, shall at this time or from time to time bring action against and likewise to Defend any action brought against me Wit. TREDDELL KEEFE, MARY LEWIS m her mark Reg. (not given)
Since John Browne Sr apparently died intestate (any records missing)… then we can ponder that Bridgett Brown probably was living on the “widow’s third” of the property. I presume that John Browne JR may or may not be living on the Petty Shore property with the widow. He possibly was living near the Virginia border where he later patented land in 1719. In any event she chose here son to act as her attorney in settling her affairs. He seems to be living within walking distance.
Note carefully the neighbors of this deed of her son Isaac Lewis in 1717… he was quite close if not adjoining to the Browne SR property. (I have not been able to place the deed on my map because it has no metes and bounds and I have to plot the surrounding deeds to isolate Isaac Lewis’ land. Also noted in the deed is Jacob Lewis as close by. (another son by my speculation).
Several points that I think are obvious…
- John Browne JR was from a previous marriage… hence the widow was more comfortable in 1713 with her own son Isaac as her attorney… OR John Browne JR was not living close by
- Bridgett Lewis had multiple children (her maiden name unknown)… my hunch is her age was similar to John Browne SR
- At the death of Bridgett Browne the Petty Shore property became fully owned by John Browne JR
- At the death of John Browne JR (prior to 1728) the property devolved to his children
Mary Best Bell, Colonial Bertie County, NC, DB A-H, 1720-1757
Bell, C 167(160) Susanah Brown, John Warren & wife Grace, Sylvester Brown and ____ to Elizabeth Joyner
Feb. 12, 1727/28. *. 256 A. “…love… for our sister Elizabeth Joyner…” Land formerly belonging to our father, John Brown dec’d. Patent July 28, 1713. On WS Chowan adj. J. Curlee, J. Smith. Wit: Fincher Hayne, Charles Brown. Court *. Thomas Crew D. C/C.
A Jolly question
A comment left lately…
I am looking for more information on John and William Jolly of Isle of Wight. John died 1687 and William was his son. William had a grant in 1705 but wondering if he went to NC. Can’t find William’s family anywhere.
So… I’ll take a stab at this…
The John Jolly d.1687 may well have been a servant imported earlier… I found a deed with that name listed and at this time it is quite likely that the headrights were legit. As William Jolly requested Administration on the “intestate” the odds are he was related and “likely” his son. (Obviously it would be helpful to see the 1687 documents and not an abstract).
Pertaining to the 1705 grant…
The original grant was to Hugh Campbell (1699) who let the patent lapse and hence it fell into the hands of William Jolly. This land was a mile or two southwest of the town of Smithfield in IOW. Before Campbell dabbled in the land it was granted to Robert Coleman in 1667. See my map here:
All of the below references to “Newport Parish” below are firmly in Isle of Wight… and distinctly support where the JOLLY property “roughly” was. (My opinion is that Newport Parish extended from the Surry County border to the IOW/Nansemond line and even further west to the Mehering River in present day Southampton County… all of which gets “iffy” at that point)
Just from a few deeds I’ve found on the web, William Jolly had acquired well over a thousand acres…but to cut to the chase… if his father died in 1687 it is my hunch that the son would die in a 20-30 year period after that. 1687 +25 =1712. He may well have died intestate and left no will. And if he was invested with considerable land in IOW… why would he move?
IOW Deed Book 7, Hopkins
(pg 17) 21 Feb 1744…. Edward Ballard and wife, Ann Ballard, of Newport Parish to John Wills, Gent., of the same… 150 acres in Newport Parish (being part of a patent formerly granted to Hugh Campbell who assigned it to William Jolly and “by several descents came to John Jolly” who sold the land to said Edward Ballard… (snip)
As Ross Perot would say… “I see a pattern here”.
I did a quick check on Familysearch.org (Virginia Records) and found basically NOTHING for a William Jolly after his 1705 grant… hence I suspect he died in the 17teens perhaps (or earlier). However, in 1710 or so a James Jolly was present in Newport Parish:
I got lazy and made these images a little small… just use Cntr + to enlarge them…sorry.
Note in the Ballard 1744 deed above “by several descents came to John Jolly”. So my guess is that James Jolly was the son of William Jolly. (Or a descendant one way or another).
Forward to about 1739 and we have a Newport Parish “processioning” record noting a John Jolly… my hunch is that by referring to the other people referenced in this record you may be able to tag this property to the general area of IOW where William Jolly was settled.
And to nail this down with a little proof and some handy-dandy DATES…
IOW Deed Bk 12, Hopkins
(p. 515) 27 Apr 1772…. John Jolly and wife, Elizabeth Jolly, to Andrew Mackie…-?- acres in Newport Parish (being land that descended by the will of James Jolly, decd., dated 28 Feb 1726 to James Jolly and then to the said John Jolly) adjoining Robert Driver…(snip)…
So James Jolly d.1726… and in 1772 John Jolly was still living… (he and his wife signed the deed)…
This is what I see…
The Immigrant died 1687…William d.17teens unknown… son James d.1726…son James d. unknown… son John d. after 1772.
And the story continues here (Chancery Records Index, Library of Virginia):
http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/default.asp#res
Search under “Isle of Wight” and simply use the search term “jolly”…
Index Number: 1806-002view details »
Locality: ISLE OF WIGHT CO
Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s)
DIXON PINNER & WIFE ETC
JOSIAH GRAY & WIFE
Index Number: 1810-001view details »
Locality: ISLE OF WIGHT CO
Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s)
INFANT(S) OF HENRY JAMAICA BY ETC
JOHN JOLLY & WIFE
Index Number: 1816-002view details »
Locality: ISLE OF WIGHT CO
Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s)
JOHN JOLLY
EMILY EVERETT
SALLEY WILLS EVERETT
Good luck with your research…
Marc
====================================
So it seems the Jollys of Isle of Wight above just do the “family thing” for numerous generations… which does not discount the idea that one may have
cut out for North Carolina. But lets let that dog lie without kicking it.
========================================
My commenter offers this theory about a Peter Jolly who has a presence in NC:
“Let me start with this, Gooch’s American Regiment was made up of men from NC, MD, NY, PA, and VA. They were raised to fight in he War of Jenkin’s Ear. Robert Jenkins, master of the Rebecca, had his ship seized by pirates in the Caribbean in 1731. Jenkins accusd his captors of cutting off one of his ears. Seven years later the story of Jenkins’ ear tipped the scales and Great Britain declared war on Spain. The regiment existed Between 29 Dec 1739 and 25 Dec 1742. Most of the recruiting was done in 1740.
The NY troops left for the Caribbean on 3 Oct 1740 and were joined at Sandy Hook by troops from East Jersey and New England. On 12 Oct the armada sailed for the VA Capes to rendezous with the troops from PA, MD<, and VA ut they had already sailed and made Port Royal, Jamaica ahead of the main convoy. The NC troops were delayed and did not arrive until March 1741.
I have the record from the Muster Book of His Majesty’s Ship Boyne for March 1740 to April 1741 which shows a Peter Jolley alive and well who was discharged Apr 1741 in camp most likely in the Caribbean and I also have the muster log from the same ship for May and June 1741 that shows Peter Jolly deceased 11 May 1741 at sea. This Peter Jolly/ey was born abt 1709. He had 3 sons I know of John, James, and Peter. Peter my 4 x great grandfather was born 1740 and died 1803 in Pitt Co., NC (his son Jesse born 1790 was my 3x great grandfather), . James stayed in Edgecombe Co. most likely on the land his mother was on until her death (no record on her death). The land James stayed on ended up in the newly formed Nash Co., and he died in Nash Co. in 1796. James was born abt 1735.
I have “a true inventory of all goods and credits of Peter Joyle (Jolly) decd” signed by his widow Rachell Jolly with her mark in 1742 from Edgecombe Co. Court.. Is it definitive, maybe-maybe not, but the time line ties in pretty good. I have found no records around that time for Peter Jolly in any of the other colonies except for a Peter Jolly in Norfolk Co. born abt 1706 who died in 1730 and his son Peter who, according to the book written by William Joliffe in 1893, went to NC about 1738 and then further south. The Jolleys in Norfolk Co. also went by the name Jolliffe from the time they settled there about 1653. There are probates that ue the name Jolley but the majoirty of it is Jolliffe.
Seeing as how I couldn’t find any other Peter Jollys besides the one in Edgecombe Co. then it seems true that the Peter Jolly who died aboard that ship is the Peter Jolly who received the land grants in Edgecombe Co. in 1741 from King George.
any way, that is about it. No problem. I believe in proof too. That is why I have not definitively said Peter 1709 came from Isle of Wight Co. because I do not have a positive indication.
Jerry”
I like a good theory… I do a lot of “speculating” myself. Lo’ and behold a James Jolly fell over dead in NC in 1670…
Alt a Generall Court, held ye 27 September, 1670, at ye house of
Sam’l Davis, for ye county of Albemarle, in ye Province of Caro-
lina. Present, the Honorable Peter Carteret, Esq., Governor and
Commander-in-Chief. Left, C>1. John Jenkins, Mr. John Harudy,
Mr. Oliver Rithd. Foster, Mr. Francis Godfrey, Mr. John Willoughby,
Capt. Thomas Cullen.
Jno. Harudy, acco. to Mr. Howard, Mr. Nixon, petition to have or-
der of administration, on ye estate of James Jolly. Ordered yt ad-
ministration be granted by putting in security.
https://archive.org/details/northcarolinahi00hathgoog
And Jolly researchers will enjoy this… it seems he hailed from Maryland and may have been in NC as an Indian Trader. And to make another point- it tears me away from the idea that these early settlers were hell bent to stay in one area. On the contrary, some were prone to move about. And lets not forget that there was considerable trade going on at the time from not only Maryland but other Colonies to the north.
I simply don’t have the time to do justice to researching the Maryland records… but here is an interesting synopsis:
http://colonialencounters.org/Databases/HistoricalDataResults.aspx?SITEABBREV=&OCCUPANTID=90
It seems that he had a son William??? Who knows if this line ended or carried on?
The Cashie River area was a hot spot for early trade… and traders. Here is another James Jolly in 1748…
Bertie COUNTY NC Deeds – Cashie Swamp (north – north east side)
Aug 16, 1748 THOMAS RYAN to WILLIAM WILSON 160 AC on NORTH SIDE of
CASHIE AT POPULAR BRANCH Wit: John Nicholas, Thomas Holder, James Jolly.
DBK F, p.195
—————————————————
Backing up a bit to 1738… here is a Peter Jolly…
Bertie County, NC…court minutes…1724-1739…Haun
At a Ct. held…Febry 1738..
224-115
…”Peter JOLLY to John JONES ackd. 40/.”
225
“Wm. PIERCE Const. in ye Room of Jos. JOLLEY”
And this is the time span that has Jerry so worked up with his theory. Peter Jolly was undoubtedly in Bertie County at that time (and it is quite possible the area was Cashie River???). In 1741 a Peter Jolly received a patent in Edgecombe County for 250 acres.
http://docsouth.unc.edu/csr/index.html/document/csr04-0171
But then, we cannot find any records of him settling the property. Did he die on the ship? Are there any militia muster rolls for Bertie around 1738-1740? There are for Edgecombe in the 1750s.
George Anderson in Halifax… 1820s…
I think it is generally assumed that the only men of that name in Edgecombe County from 1756 or so until the 1830s or so was George Sr b. 1756 and his son George Jr b. 1798. I have always assumed they remained on their properties near Walnut Creek until they packed up and moved to Henderson County, Tenn. about 1837… evidently not.
Either the father or the son George was in business as a storekeeper in the town of Halifax at least by 1824. The only other culprit by the name of George to reasonably be in Halifax was a grandson of Peter Anderson d. 1801. But he was b.1812 and hence would only be 12 years old in 1824.
So… unless someone can counter my assumption… I take the following to be my ancestor…
DRAT!… I proved myself wrong. There is a George Anderson in Halifax in 1820… he could easily be a son of either the James or William in 1810. I was suspicious of this guy because I cannot believe ANY of my clan can carry a tune. I’ll just leave my ramblings in place without editing and bear the embarassment. The guy WAS a Mason tho’ if that helps anyone else….. (smiling).
Scattered throughout the Tarboro newspaper accounts are “Lists of Letters” which sit idle in the Post Office which must perturb the postmaster… George evidently did not care much for mail as he is constantly cited… but this one caught my eye because this is in the town of Halifax in 1824…
And then this…
Sept 12, 1824… The business drops a partner (Henry Mason) and re-emerge a few days later as Anderson and Loudon… next door to the Bank. Note the byline is Halifax.
Henry Mason is still a mystery to me.. here he is in 1825 trying to collect from the dead beat Governor (from the Govs papers)… not sure if he collected?
http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ead/id/97690
H. G. (Hutchins Gordon) Burton was a United States representative (1819-1824) from and governor (1824-1827) of North Carolina. The collection includes family, political, and business papers of Burton, including letters pertaining chiefly to North Carolina and national politics, including the 1824 presidential election, economic conditions, and horse racing.
Robert Loudon was a Mason… more of interest because he was of the Royal White Hart Lodge #2 of Halifax…
Royal White Hart was established 1767 and is the second oldest lodge in NC. A colorful history is online…….. But this caught my interest…
So George was also a Mason, which does not surprise me… one of the extant tombstones in Henderson, Tenn has a Masonic emblem prominently displayed.
My hunch is that this is George Anderson Jr. If so, the old boy could sing… which does surprise me.
And the old boy kept his ties to Edgecombe County… here he is in a Grand Jury, 1834, voicing a few concerns and trashing a Senator they did not agree with one whit, thank you.
All fun stuff to research… and all new to me. An old family account from 1959 has some Andersons apparently living near Scotland Neck which has always perplexed me… perhaps this can lead to some new revelations?
May 13, 1959 (Hugh B. Johnston article)
WILLIAM ANDERSON
(This traditional account of William Anderson, 1732-1789, was written by Mrs. A.C. Davis of Rocky Mount.)
William Anderson…came to Edgecombe about 1732…by old records a Scotsman who did not want to fight England, along with more Scotch in the county, his son James having a store at Tarborough when it was only a ferry and warehouse to collect Quit Rents for the Lords Proprietors or Earl Granville.
His sons and daughters wed mostly in a near-by section and his old home is, I feel sure, where I was brought home a month-old baby to the old home of my grandfather, as his holdings reached from the north side of Tar River.
…But 12 children caused some of them not to have much land and to go back where they probably came from, on the Halifax line where many more Andersons probably lived.
Two wives, and he does not say that the first died, gave him 12 children (last wife is also “Uncle Sam” Davis great-great aunt). My great-grandmother Evalina Anderson was said to be the child of one who lived Scotland Neck, and Nathan Guilford Worsley was of the Worsleys near the head of Conetoe Creek. They came to live where her grandfather William Anderson had probably early in the 1700’s built on Cokey Road high on a red hill top, where oaks and sycamores grew; his house had a great room, smaller room, two shed-rooms, an attic upstairs, basement, small coluned front porch at the chimney (not there now) in slavery times, log kitchen some distance away, and a small back porch used as a dining room on occasion.
Boxwoods in the vegetable garden walk and crepe myrtles among oaks, it was typical of a Scotch Highlander and his descendants, even to those old phlox, of sweet smell, in the vegetable garden as I knew it as a child, for I had this very house as my first home, father living with old Aunts Worsley, sisters of my grandmother, about five miles out from Rocky Mount beyond West Edgecombe School, and it has been in continuous possession of Anderson descendants. Grandmother Lizzina Worsley Bullock was born there, and it was on the Old Stage Coach Road (Cokey) before anyone had even thought of a war with England, when this home of Andersons was built.
These Andersons…were strong Old Side Baptists who believed in predestination, as most Highland Scotch did, and many left Scotland for North Ireland and America for their Campbellistic belief, but still did not want to fight England. Many of my kin were stingy and thrifty as Scotch and just as eccentric. Possibly I am wrong about it, even his house. It has taken me seventy-six years to study out the origin of this place, my first home, and I expect some will say I am just day dreaming…as to just who once lived on that hill.
I had told the Aunt whom I last visited, Mrs. Frank Bullock that it was at least 150 years old. Now I am sure I underestimated it by fifty years. The basement was filled in by my Uncle Frank’s family, the front porch made longer after 1912 and a kitchen built on, but for many years it was as first built, 150 years ago at least, and might even be 250 years now from my memory of it.
My friend David Gammon has weighed in with some thoughts. He is from the area and is a wealth of genealogy trivia that never ceases to amaze me.
I just re-read this. I think you can read it two ways. As usual, there is a grain of truth in it, but it got distorted with the passage of time. I am pulling out the facts as she presents them, and I can’t resist an editorial comment or two:
1. Evelina Anderson was the granddaughter of the 1789 William Anderson.
2. The father of Evelina Anderson was from near Scotland Neck.
3. 1789 William was born in 1732, and came to America from Scotland that same year because he did not want to fight England. (Now that’s one hell of a baby.)
4. Some of the children of 1789 William did not inherit much, so they went back to near the Halifax County line where they had lived before. (what happened to the Scotland story?)
5. Other Andersons lived up near the Halifax County line.
At first hearing, this seems to be the ramblings of a very old woman, who remembers some things she heard, and has confused some others. The part about Evelina forward I believe – it’s the earlier part that I don’t believe.
Here’s what we can prove that seems to relate:
1. Evelina Anderson was daughter of Charlotte Anderson, who can be proved to be a sibling of Old Man Micajah Anderson, Josiah Anderson, and Elizabeth Anderson Pittman. If there were other siblings, then they died without issue prior to Josiah in the late 1860s, and were thus not heirs to his estate. The census indicates Charlotte Anderson never married, so Evelina was illegitimate. And we know that she was not the granddaughter of 1789 William – most likely a great-granddaughter, however.
2. Old Man Micajah (Evelina’s uncle) did indeed live over near Scotland Neck for a while. In his autobiography, he states that he and his first wife Nancy lived first on the Avington farm. This is a misspelling of Abbington. The Abbington farms were in Halifax County near the Cow Haul Swamp, south of Scotland Neck. Likewise, Elizabeth Anderson Pittman lived in that area. But we cannot prove that Josiah or Charlotte ever lived in that area. So the part about Scotland Neck is true, but for a different person. An example of a true fact getting twisted with time. One might theorize that Micajah, who was perhaps the oldest child, married Nancy and his sister Elizabeth moved with them to the Abbington farm. Josiah and Charlotte may have stayed behind, with other relatives. I am presuming the parents had already died.
3. Old Man Micajah eventually moved to Township 5 (Lower Fishing Creek) in Edgecombe, which, as the crow flies, was not far from the Abbington farm where he started out his married life. The farm where he eventually lived was about three miles or so south of the Halifax County line. There were no other Andersons in this part of the world. So I presume this tale was indeed based in some truth but got distorted with time.
4. The red hill top was on Cokey Road, according to this account. Cokey Road still exists, and is Highway 43, coming southwest out of Rocky Mount heading towards West Edgecombe School. The land in that area is mostly flat, but occasionally there is a slight hill.
Here are a few things worth exploring, however:
1. The heirs of Charlotte Anderson, which appear to be ONLY the children of Evelina Anderson Worsley.
3. The identity of “Uncle Sam Davis,” who the author says was great-great-nephew of the second wife of 1789 William Anderson. May not pan out – but worth exploring. The author is a Mrs. Davis – so he must be on her husband’s side of the family.
DG
———————
Could it be that George Anderson moved near Scotland Neck and is the genesis of her “fuzzy” recollections?
But here he is “apparently” near the Walnut Creek area in 1834 (Battle had property adjoining both Georges’). In debt in 1834 and leaves in 1837… still unanswered questions.
The George Anderson property in Edgecombe County…
https://andersonnc.wordpress.com/george-anderson-b-1756-edgecombe-property/
Revolutionary War account… George Jr. states his father made it to Henderson County, Tenn and dies August, 1837…
She burned the damn will….
My head hurts…. I think I have reached my limit…. I am running out of hair to pull out.
Joani Taylor and I are trying to unravel the spaghetti pile of Pitt folks in IOW… she is focused on her guy James Pitt who wanders down to Edgecombe County, NC about 1797 or so and dies…
a little background…
Joseph Godwin d. c1760
1) Matthew Godwin
a) Joseph Godwin
b) James Godwin
2) James Godwin
a) James Godwin
b) Joseph Godwin
3) Jonathan Godwin
a) Jonathan Godwin
b) Samuel Godwin
4) Patience Godwin m. James Pitt
a) Joseph Pitt
5) Martha Milner
6) Thomas Godwin
7) Samuel Godwin
8) Elizabeth Smith
WILL OF JOSEPH GODWIN OF ISLE OF WIGHT, VA
In the name of God Amen I Joseph Godwin of the County of Isle of Wight being
very sick and weak but in my perfect sensce and memory do ordain this my last
Will and Testament as followeth ~
I give unto my two Grandsons Joseph & James Godwin Sons of my Son Matthew two
hundred acres of land that I bought of Thomas Underwood joining the Old
Plantation and bounded by a line of marked trees and known by the name of the
Cyprus Pocosin and Ten Pounds Cash apeace to be paid unto them when they come
of age by my hereafter mentioned Exors and if either of them should die
before they come of age then their part to go to the other ~
I give unto my Grandson James Godwin son of my son James half of the crop of
corn now upon the ground & two younf heffers I give unto my Grandson Joseph
Godwin son of my son James Two Young Heffers and five pounds cash which money
I desire may be paid out of my stock ~
I give unto my Grandson Joseph Pitt forty Shillings cash to be paid unto him
immediately after this my will is proved and one young heffer ~
I give unto my two grandsons Jonathan and Samuel Godwin sons of my son
Jonathan my negro girl called Pegg to be equally divided between them ~
I give unto my daughter Patience Pitt fifty pound the money that (last ??)
was valued to ?? ~
I give unto my daughter Martha Milner two cows and one younf heffer ~
I give unto my son Thomas Godwin one bed and furnioture and my wearing
clothes ~
I give unto my son Samuel Godwin my negro man Saul ~
I leave my negro Pink to be sold and Ten Pounds of the money to be given to
my son Jonathan Godwin ~
I give unto my daughter Elizabeth Smith five pound cash to be raised out of
my stock ~
I give unto my daughter Martha Milner ten pound if so much left after my
other legacies is paid~
And all the rest of my estate to be disposed of at the descretion of my
hereafter mentioned executor among my grandchildren after my just debts is
paid ~
And I do appoint and ordain my Son in Law James Pitt my Whole & Sole Executor
of this my Last Will & Testament in Witness hereof I have hereunto set my
Hand and fix my Seal this 17th day of November 1757 ~
Joseph Godwin (S S)
Sealed & Signed in presence of us]
Thomas Godwin
Samuel Bridger
James Godwin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At a Court held for Isle of Wight County January 1st 1761 ~
The Last Will and Testament of Joseph Godwin Deced was presented in Court by
James Pitt the Executor therein named who made oath thereto and being proved
by the Oath of Thomas Godwin and Samuel Bridger two of the witnesses thereto
is ordered to be recorded ~
Test Richard Baker Cl
—————-
Got it? Simple enough…. James married Patience… Nope… lots of controversy….
PATIENCE GODWIN
source:
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=bfulgham&id=I18789
Chapman’s Isle of Wight County Marriages records the marriage of John Pitt and ……(Prob. Patience) Godwin, sister of Thomas Godwin, in 1748. This date is not considered accurate based on John Pitt’s death date of 1748 and the fact that he and Patience had six children. The will of Joseph Godwin, father of Patience and Thomas, and grandfather of Joseph Pitt, appears to add credibility to the assumed marriage of John Pitt and Patience Godwin
Chapman’s Isle of Wight County Marriages records the marriage of James Pitt and Patience Godwon, daiughter of Joseph Godwin, in 1757. Patience’s first husband, John Pitt, had died in 1748. Her father, Joseph Godwin. lists James Pitt as son-in-law in his will of 1757. Although Patience and John Pitt had six children, it is unclear if Patience and James Pitt had any children.
I think I can figure out the problem above… a John Pitt marries a daughter/sister, (whatever) “Patience” of Thomas Godwin… and a James Pitt marries a daughter “Patience” of Joseph Godwin……….. simple.
from Sallys Place (she seems to agree with me)
http://www.sallysfamilyplace.com/MulberryGrove/godwint.htm
Children of Col. Thomas Godwin II died 1714 and Martha Bridger:
1. Col. Thomas Godwin III ca 1680 – 1734/40
married Mary Godwin his first cousin
2. Joseph Godwin ca 1680/5 – 1761 Isle of Wight Co will
Burgess for Isle of Wight 1714, 1723; high sheriff and of the court in1719, 1720
names grandsons , Joseph, Jonathan.
a. Samuel Godwin bef 1717 –
b. Elizabeth Godwin bef 1717 –
c. Matthew Godwin
i. Joseph Godwin
ii. James Godwin
d. Thomas Godwin
e. Jonathan Godwin ca 1710 – 1769
i. Samuel Godwin
ii. Jonathan Godwin
f. Patience Godwin
married James Pitt
James Pitt married 2nd Mrs. Mary Rand Smith
g. James Godwin 1715/20 – 1750
married Elizabeth
i. James Godwin
ii. Joseph Godwin
married 2nd Mary Moscrop
dau of Thomas Moscrop and wife Susanna will 1745 Isle of Wight
h. William Godwin
I have “smoking gun” proof that one James Pitt did in fact marry Mary Rand Smith…
https://andersonnc.wordpress.com/pitt-_iow-to-edgecombe/
But there is a John Pitt that dies in 1748 and another in 1760… my head is starting to throb….
The will of John Pitt dated Nov 17 1748 named legatees: son John; son Edmond; daughter Elizabeth; daughter Mary; daughter Lidia; son Joseph. Executors: brother Joseph Pitt and brother-in-law Thomas Godwin. Witnesses: Charles Fulgham, Joseph Bridger, Jr., & John House. Recorded March 9 1748.
I’m guessing the sister of Thomas Godwin was named Patience? But then again, she evidently has died by the time of the 1748 will… she is not mentioned. (So Chapman was correct in her abstract where she said “______ Godwin married John Pitt, sister of Thomas Godwin.” I have no idea what her name was.)
Pitt, John – will dated 6 Dec 1760 recorded 5 Mar 1761. A suit now depending for 500 acres that Captain John Monro died in possession of to be continued for my son; wife Priscilla; son John; daughters Elizabeth and Priscilla; son William Pitt. Witness William Casey, Elizabeth Cutchins and Samuel Cutchins Jr. [7:61]
And now the lawsuits start….
Isle of Wight Co., VA, Order Book 1772-1780, p. 216
abstracted by Matt HARRIS [brackets, line breaks & surname capitalization mine]
[p] 216
[At a court held for Isle of Wight Co. 5 Nov 1773]
Put in the County of Isle of Wight of the demise of John PITTS ~
This day came as well the Plaintif by his Attorney as Jonathan GODWIN who
was admitted defendant in this Suit in the Room of the said Nicholas WAIL, by
their Attorney, and thereupon also came a Jury, to wit, Joseph FULLGHAM,
Richard WILLIAMS, Nathan WHITLEY, William HODSDEN, Henry PITT [would this Henry Pitt be on this “Jury” if he was “related” John Pitt?], Joseph
ATKINSON, Robert DRIVER, Thomas CUTCHIN, Thomas PARKER, John SMELLY, Aaron
SPIVEY and William BELL, who being elected tryed and Sworn the truth to speake
upon the Issue Joined upon their Oath do say that the defendant is Guilty in
manner and form as in the declaration against him is alledged, and they do
assess the Plaintifs damages by occasion thereof to one penny besides his
Costs, Therefore it is considered that the Plaintif Recover against the
defendant his term yet to come of and in the premmises together with his
damages aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed and his Costs by him about his
Suit in this behalf expended and the said defendant may be taken &.c ~
[margin note] Costs 256 Cs Gross Tob.o & 30/ or 300 D Tob.o ~
———————————————–
William DAVIS………………..Plt.}
against } In Debt upon a bond by consent of the
} parties without a Suit
Nathaniel BURWELL……………Deft.}
This [‘day’] came as well the plaintif by his Attorney as the defendant
in his proper person and the said defendant acknowledgeth to owe to the
Plaintif the sum of fifty four pounds the debt in the said bond mentioned,
Therefore It is considered by the Court that the plaintif Recover against the
defendant the said fifty four pounds and his Costs by him about his Suit in
this behalf expended and the said defendant in Mercy &.c But this Judgement
is to be discharged by the payment of twenty seven pounds with Interest for
the same to be computed after the Rate of five Per Centum Per Annum from 25.th
day of October 1773 ’till payment and the Costs ~
[margin note] Costs 61 Cs Gross Tob.o & 15/ or 150 D Tob.o ~
———————————————–
Present Arthur SMITH & Daniel HERRING Junior Gent.
———————————————–
Absent Brewer GODWIN Gent. ~
———————————————–
A writing purporting the last Will and Testament of Ann FULLGHAM deceased
being produced and Read and heard on the depositions taken and Returned and
the validity thereof strongly contested, It is the opinion of the Court that
the said Writing is the true last will and Testament of the said of the said
Ann FULLGHAM as to such personal Estate as she died seised of, and it is
Ordered to be Recorded ~
———————————————–
John PITT by Joseph CUTCHIN his Guardian}
and next friend…………………….}….Plt.}
against } In Detinue
Thomas CAMPBELL………………………..Deft.}
This day came as well the Plaintif by his Attorney as the defendant by
his attorney and thereupon the case agreed in this Cause in lieu of a special
Verdict being Solemnly argued, it seems to the Court upon the whole matter
that the law is for the Plaintif ~
[page break]
And here is the lawsuit that makes my head hurt… because “I think” this John Pitt mentions a brother “James”… which could be Joani’s guy… but then again, She burned the damn will!
http://www.lva.virginia.gov/chancery/case_detail.asp?CFN=093-1790-008
There are 17 pages in the link… click on these images below a couple times to enlarge…
“…That a few days after the death of Jno Pitt she heard Elizabeth / now Mitchell sister of the said Pitt ask Priscilla Cutchings her mother for the said Will who went to the desk & took the said Will & read it to the said Elizabeth, & that she the said Elizabeth read it herself at the same time _ that the said Elizabeth then informed this deponent that her brother John Pitt had given all the land & everything else away from her which she did not believe until she had seen it herself _ a few days after this _ the said Elizabeth confessed (crossed out) told this deponent in a conversation that she would endeavor to destroy the said Will…”
My question is…
James Pitt married Patience Godwin… did they have any children?
And… is there any proof he remarried to Mary Rand Smith? Any children?
——————
After reading the account… it seems this John Pitt, writing his will in 1780, did NOT refer to a “brother” James. His accounting is “my brother(s) James and Joseph Cuchings”. Apparently his only heir being his sister Elizabeth.
The scam evidently fooled her husband until his death at about the same time…
Will and Administrations of Isle of Wight County Virginia 1647-1800
RICHARD WEST
13Jan1781
1Mar1781
To brother RALPH, horse which was taken into public service by Capt. WILLIAM SPILLER; dau PRISCILLA PITT WEST; wife ELIZABETH, estate she inherited from her brother, JOHN PITT; son JOHN PITT WEST.
Exec: brother RALPH WEST, also the guardian to dau PRISCILLA PITT WEST.
Wits: JOHN SCARSBROOK WILLS, JOSIAH CUTCHIN, JAMES CASEY.
Security: THOMAS KING, JAMES WILLS.
She then remarried James Mitchell… she apparently was left nothing in both wills… after the sparks settled down.
————–
If you start putting all these jigsaw pieces together a picture begins to emerge…
From the 1773 lawsuit, Joseph Cutchin is acting on behalf of an underage John Pit. Joseph Cutchin married his mother Priscilla Pitt …
Pitt, John – will dated 6 Dec 1760 recorded 5 Mar 1761. A suit now depending for 500 acres that Captain John Monro died in possession of to be continued for my son; wife Priscilla; son John; daughters Elizabeth and Priscilla; son William Pitt. Witness William Casey, Elizabeth Cutchins and Samuel Cutchins Jr. [7:61]
John Pitt d.1760 was the father of John Pitt d.1780.
—————-
I slammed Joani with a challenge… What proof is there that John Pitt d 1748 is the father of John d1760?
She comes back with a record of 2 slave’s names…. not bad…. remember that my proof for the death of Jame’s brother Henry was a “ring”… c’mon folks we are grasping at straws.
At a court held for Isle of Wight County March 9th 1748. The last Will and Testament of John Pitt deceased was presented in Court by Joseph Pitt one of the Executors therein named who made oath thereto and being proved by the Oath of Charles Fulgham and Joseph Bridger Junior two of the witnesses thereto is ordered to be recorded.
John Pitt 1761 his wife md Joseph Cutchin
John Pitt
Date: Dec 6, 1760
Location: Isle Of Wight
Record ID: 23446
Description: Testator
Prove Date: Mar 5, 1761
Book-Page: 7-61
Remarks: John Pitt. Leg.-a suit now depending for 500 acres, that Captain John Monro died in possession of, to be continued for my son; wife Priscilla; son John; daughter Elizabeth; daughter Priscilla; son William Pitt.
This probate record was extracted from microfilmed copies of the original Will Book.
6) John 1761 slaves
– PETER, JUDAH, WILL, BEN, JACOB, HARRY, LUKE
That’s it folks …. that is the proof… if you don’t like it make a comment and show where we are wrong.
Further back, the father of John 1748 was Henry Pitt d 1719 (his Executor was brother Joseph and bro in law Thomas Godwin)… so this entire line of “Johns” traces to the first Robert Pitt.
———————
From this newly found will of 1780 several questions may be answered…. it seems that John Pitt d.1780 has only ONE heir… his sister Elizabeth. Which means the other siblings in the will must be dead (Priscilla and William). Apparently he felt his sister was taken care of by her marriage to Richard West so he left his property to his mother and half brothers James and Joseph Cutchin.
His mother Priscilla Pitt Cutchin dies 1787…
In the left margine of this deed it is written
” September 3 , 1810 debtr to Maj. Jos. Cutchin”
This indenture made 1st day of December 1783 between JAMES MITCHELL of Newport In Co. of IOW and ELIZABETH his wife of the one part and JOHN PITT WEST of the same parish and county of the other part – whereas on JOHN PITT late of said County and IOW was in his lifetime at the time of his daeath seized and possessed of a very considerable estate in lands lying and being in the parish and county aforesaid and being so seized departed this life making any proper legal dispostion of the same by virtue – -whereby the said lands of the said JOHN PITT hath by law descend and come to the aforesaid Elizabeth, party herto, as the only sister of the whole blood and heir at law of the said JOHN PITT deceased now this indenture – – therefore witnesseth that the said JAMES MITCHELLand ELIZABETH his wife for the natural love and affection and for and in consideration of the sum of 5 shillings current money of Virginia by JOHN PITT WEST to the said JAMES MITCHELL and ELIZABETH his wife in hand paid – – hath granted – – unto JOHN PITT WEST and his heirs – – a parcel of land – -200 acres being part of the lands which have descended and come to the said ELIZABETH as the only sister and heir of law of the said JOHN PITTdeceased bounded as followeth –
to wit beginning at an oak a corner tree of JAMES MITCHELL’S running so 45 poles along a line of marked trees to a corner pine – thence souht 20 degrees west along a line of marked trees – 225 poles to the SANDY RIDGE ROAD then up the said road to a marked tree standing near the road thence north 57 degrees east along a line of marked trees across the swamp called the GREAT SWAMP to CUTCHIN’S line then
along a line of marked trees southwardly to a gum and corner tree of PRISCILLA CUTCHIN’S thence eastwardly along a line of marked trees to the first station – – and all houses, edifices, buildings, gardens orchards, waters, water courses – – -unto the said John Pitt West his heirs – – Signed JAMES MITCHELL ( his seal)
ELIZABETH MITCHELL (her seal)
In presence of – THOMAS SMITH, JAMES PEDEN, JAMES WILLS
Proved 4th March 1784
Old Nansemond Will Book 7, Page 261
[Suffolk Court House, Virginia]In the name of God Amen I, THOMAS GODWIN of Nansemond County being very sick
do make this my last will & testament in manner and form following:First I give and bequeath unto my son THOMAS GODWIN the land and plantation
whereon John Samson now lives to him and his heirs.It: I give and bequeath unto my son JOHN GODWIN all the land and plantation I
purchased of William Campbell to him & his heirs forever.Thirdly, I give and bequeath unto my two sons READE and JEREMIAH GODWIN all
the lands I purchased of my brother EDMOND GODWIN to be equally divided
between them, beginning at the main Creek and taking its length outwards to
them and their heirs forever.Fourthly, I give and bequeath unto my son JAMES GODWIN my watter mill with
her stones and tackling to him and his heirs. As for the rest of my estate
of what nature or kind soever I desire it may be equally divided between my
loving wife, MARGARET GODWIN and seven children, THOMAS GODWIN, JOHN GODWIN,
READE GODWIN, JEREMIAH GOEWIN, JAMES GODWIN, MARY GODWIN, SAMUEL GODWIN.I appoint my two sons THOMAS GODWIN and JOHN GODWIN my Executors of this my
last will and testament. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and
seal this 11th day of December 1749.THOMS.
GODWIN, (S.S.)
Signed, sealed & delivered
in the presence of us
Thos. Davis
JOSHUA GODWIN
BURGH GODWIN
MATTHEW GODWIN
At a Court held for Nansemond County, February 12th 1749.
The last will and Testament of THOMAS GODWIN Gent: deceased, was proved by
the oaths of JOSHUA GODWIN, BURGH GODWIN and MATTHEW GODWIN, three of the
witnesses thereto, and ordered to be recorded.
Teste,
J. Wright Cl. Court
At a Court held for Nansemond County April 9th, 1750.
THOMAS GODWIN and JOHN GODWIN, the Executors named in the LAST WILL AND
Testament of THOMAS GODWIN, Gent: deced, refusing to take upon them the
bother of the execution thereof; on the motion of MARGARET GODWIN, relict of
the said THOMAS GODWIN dec’d who made oath according to law: certificate is
granted for her obtaining letters of Administration on the estate of the sd.
THOMAS GODWIN with his said will annexed in due form: Whereupon she with
EDMOND GODWIN, John Reade, James Pitt, and JOSHUA GODWIN, her securities
entered into bond for that purpose.
Teste,
J. Wright Cl. Cur.
A copy Teste; Peter B. Prentis, Clerk
VIRGINIA:
In the Clerk’s Office of Nansemond County Circuit Court, the 13th, day of
April, 1918. The foregoing Copy of Will with certificates thereon was
produced by Miss Mildred M. Holladay to the Clerk of said Court and on her
application is recorded anew, the Will Book from which the same was copied
having being destroyed by the burning of the Clerk’s Office and the records
on the 7th day of February, 1866.
Teste: G. E. Bunting, Clerk
By: Ruby V. Benton, D.C.