The practical surveyor, or, the art of land-measuring, made easy …
I was curious how a Colonial surveyor might calculate the survey Metes and Bounds and turn those measurements into the total acreage.
Naturally, I asked Grok:
Calculating the Area (per Grok)
To calculate the total acres, colonial surveyors would follow a process that, while less precise than modern methods, was practical for the era. Here’s a detailed breakdown:
- Plot the Parcel:
- The surveyor would physically measure the distances and bearings in the field using a chain and compass, marking the corners with stakes or other monuments (e.g., trees, stones). They might also sketch a rough plat (map) on paper or a plane table to visualize the shape, as seen in historical plats like George Washington’s 1750 survey for John Lindsey, 223 acres in Frederick County, Va.
- Divide into Simpler Shapes:
- For irregular parcels, which were common in metes and bounds surveys, the surveyor would divide the land into simpler geometric shapes, such as triangles, trapezoids, or rectangles. For example, a quadrilateral could be split into two triangles by drawing a diagonal from the POB to the opposite corner.
- Calculate the Area of Each Shape:
- For Rectangles or Squares: If the parcel was roughly rectangular, they could use the formula:Area (in acres)=length (in chains)×width (in chains)10\text{Area (in acres)} = \frac{\text{length (in chains)} \times \text{width (in chains)}}{10}
\text{Area (in acres)} = \frac{\text{length (in chains)} \times \text{width (in chains)}}{10}This worked because 1 acre = 10 square chains, a fact noted in historical surveying practices. For example, a parcel 10 chains by 10 chains would be (10 × 10) / 10 = 10 acres.
- For Triangles: They would use the formula for the area of a triangle:Area=12×a×b×sin(C)\text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times a \times b \times \sin(C)
\text{Area} = \frac{1}{2} \times a \times b \times \sin(C)where:- (a) and (b) are the lengths of two sides (in chains or poles, converted as needed).
- (C) is the included angle between those sides, measured with a compass or estimated from the bearings. It was about here my eyes began to cross…
- sin(C)\sin(C)
\sin(C)could be looked up in trigonometric tables, which were available by the 1700s, thanks to works like Edmund Gunter’s surveying manuals. For example, if a=38.25a = 38.25a = 38.25chains, b=38.25b = 38.25b = 38.25chains, and C=20°C = 20°C = 20°, with sin(20°)≈0.342\sin(20°) \approx 0.342\sin(20°) \approx 0.342, the area would be 12×38.25×38.25×0.342≈245.14\frac{1}{2} \times 38.25 \times 38.25 \times 0.342 \approx 245.14\frac{1}{2} \times 38.25 \times 38.25 \times 0.342 \approx 245.14square chains, then divided by 10 for acres. - For Trapezoids: They might use the average of the two parallel sides multiplied by the height, divided by 2, again converting to acres after calculating in square chains.
- For Rectangles or Squares: If the parcel was roughly rectangular, they could use the formula:Area (in acres)=length (in chains)×width (in chains)10\text{Area (in acres)} = \frac{\text{length (in chains)} \times \text{width (in chains)}}{10}
- Sum the Areas:
- If the parcel was divided into multiple shapes (e.g., two triangles), the areas of each shape would be calculated and summed to get the total area in square chains.
- Convert to Acres:
- The total area in square chains would be divided by 10 to get the area in acres, leveraging the relationship 1 acre = 10 square chains.
Grok’s answer did not satisfy me because, in my heart, I knew that a simple surveyor of 1753 would challenge you to a duel or thrash you unmercifully with a cane if you confronted him with that much unfathomable mathematics all at on time. Remember, none of these good folks even saw a need for middle names.
So I Googled, as any rational person would do… and found a good book that most surveyors had not read, because, well… many if not most could not read. Junior Colleges were scarce in Colonial North Carolina.
https://archive.org/details/b30505586/mode/2up

Grok can just, well, kiss my ass for lack of a better term.
Hilarious! I hated algebra (although occasionally useful in paint chemistry) and Grok lost me at “sin” lol!
kanderson819
June 8, 2025 at 7:07 am
Laughing…I remember in 7th grade, they introduced us to “New Math”…
I never recovered.
I learned the multiplication tables all the way to 12×12… they told me we now use calculators. How’d that work out.
anderson1951
June 8, 2025 at 7:12 am